Comparison Overview

MGM Grand Detroit

VS

Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel

MGM Grand Detroit

1777 3rd Street, Detroit, Michigan, US, 48101
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

MGM Grand Detroit is the city’s first and only downtown hotel, gaming and entertainment destination built from the ground up. The hotel features 400 chic and stylish guest rooms, including nine rooftop VIP suites and 56 opulent corner suites. The 147,000-square foot casino includes Detroit’s only premier poker room, nearly 150 table games, and nearly 2,500 of the hottest slots and video poker machines. Guests enjoy signature restaurants including Detroit’s modern steakhouse & lounge, D.PRIME; the hotel's own sports pub, TAP at MGM Grand Detroit; an urban food hall, Detroit Central Market; several bars and lounges; Detroit's premier sports betting destination, BetMGM Sports Lounge and IMMERSE, the only resort-style spa in Southeast Michigan. More than 30,000 square feet of meeting space hosts everything from large corporate events to intimate black-tie affairs. MGM Grand Detroit is a wholly owned subsidiary of MGM Resorts International (NYSE: MGM). For more information, visit mgmgranddetroit.com or call toll free at (877) 888-2121.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 887
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel

7741 M 72 E, Williamsburg, MI, 49690, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel is located at 7741 M-72, Williamsburg, MI 49690 just minutes away from Michigan's iconic Traverse City. Our 56,000-square-foot casino in Traverse City has everything you need to get your game on including video poker, craps, blackjack, Let It Ride, roulette, and all the latest slots, from penny to $100 denominations. Visit our website for current hours of operation at: https://www.turtlecreekcasino.com/hours-of-operation

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 137
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mgm-grand-detroit.jpeg
MGM Grand Detroit
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turtle-creek-casino.jpeg
Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MGM Grand Detroit
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MGM Grand Detroit in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel in 2025.

Incident History — MGM Grand Detroit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MGM Grand Detroit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mgm-grand-detroit.jpeg
MGM Grand Detroit
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turtle-creek-casino.jpeg
Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MGM Grand Detroit company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MGM Grand Detroit company.

In the current year, Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel company and MGM Grand Detroit company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel company nor MGM Grand Detroit company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel company nor MGM Grand Detroit company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel company nor MGM Grand Detroit company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MGM Grand Detroit company nor Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MGM Grand Detroit nor Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MGM Grand Detroit company.

MGM Grand Detroit company employs more people globally than Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither MGM Grand Detroit nor Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MGM Grand Detroit nor Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MGM Grand Detroit nor Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MGM Grand Detroit nor Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MGM Grand Detroit nor Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MGM Grand Detroit nor Turtle Creek Casino & Hotel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H