Comparison Overview

MV Law

VS

Fosters Solicitors

MV Law

Level 2, Canberra, ACT, 2601, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

MV Law is a dynamic Australian commercial law and advisory firm based in Canberra. Formed in 2005 through the merger between Meyer Clapham and Vandenberg Reid, our firm is recognised for providing quality service to all our clients. We undertake work for clients at a local and national level, as well as internationally Our knowledgeable staff offer expert legal advice, with a particular focus in the areas of property, commercial and financial law. The firm’s success is based on delivering excellence and value, with clients ranging from small and medium enterprises to large scale property developers, construction entities, tertiary, banking and financial services institutions. We work with Commonwealth and Territory government agencies, businesses, and individuals wanting to set up their first business or plan for succession.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fosters Solicitors

William House, Norwich, undefined, NR2 4FS, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Founded in 1761, Fosters is an award-winning East Anglian law firm with offices in Norfolk and Suffolk, including Norwich, Wymondham and Lowestoft. We pride ourselves on having partners and solicitors who are highly trained in specialist areas. This is reflected by the firm and the number of our experts being recommended and recognised as leading individuals in The Legal 500 and Chambers guide to the legal profession. Our aim is to provide high quality service that you can trust, and we are proud to hold both Lexcel and Customer Service Excellence national accreditation, emphasising our commitment to client care. If we can help you with empathetic legal advice across any of our practice areas, which include: Business & Commercial; Crime & Business Defence; Family Law; Litigation & Dispute Resolution; Personal Injury & Group Actions, Medical Negligence & Inquests; Residential and Commercial Property and Wills, Trusts & Probate – please contact us on 01603 620508 or via our website for more information.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 137
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meyer-vandenberg-lawyers.jpeg
MV Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fosters-solicitors.jpeg
Fosters Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MV Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fosters Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MV Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fosters Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — MV Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MV Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fosters Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fosters Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meyer-vandenberg-lawyers.jpeg
MV Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fosters-solicitors.jpeg
Fosters Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both MV Law company and Fosters Solicitors company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Fosters Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MV Law company.

In the current year, Fosters Solicitors company and MV Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fosters Solicitors company nor MV Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fosters Solicitors company nor MV Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fosters Solicitors company nor MV Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MV Law company nor Fosters Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MV Law nor Fosters Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MV Law company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fosters Solicitors company.

Fosters Solicitors company employs more people globally than MV Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither MV Law nor Fosters Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MV Law nor Fosters Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MV Law nor Fosters Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MV Law nor Fosters Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MV Law nor Fosters Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MV Law nor Fosters Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X