Comparison Overview

Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery

VS

PrintCBF

Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery

1196 Noles Dr, Mount Holly, North Carolina, 28120, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://metroprint.ink

Since 1971 Metro Print, Inc. has been serving the Carolinas as an Industrial and Commercial graphics company. Even though there have been quite a few changes since 1971, our commitment to quality and customer service remains the same. We are incredibly grateful to our 400+ customers in the Piedmont area who have supported us over the past 40 years. To all of those customers, let us say, ThankYou

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

PrintCBF

240 Cedar Knolls Road, Cedar Knolls, NJ, 07927, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.printcbf.com

In 1983, printcbf was founded on the basic principles of providing excellent print communications and services while maintaining the highest ethical standards. That tradition still stands strong today. By constantly enhancing our product mix to meet ever-changing needs in the business arena, we have excelled in service and quality products. From promotional products to barcodes and labels, printcbf has a vast array of products to specifically fit our clients'​ requests. We specialize in Thermal Media, Commercial Printing, Digital & Variable Imaging/Direct Mail, Custom Business Forms and Promotional Items. printcbf: a creative company with brilliant ideas, focused on your business Visit us at www.printcbf.com. For more information, please contact us at 973-682-9000 or [email protected]

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metro-print.jpeg
Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printcbf.jpeg
PrintCBF
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PrintCBF
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PrintCBF in 2025.

Incident History — Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PrintCBF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PrintCBF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metro-print.jpeg
Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printcbf.jpeg
PrintCBF
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PrintCBF company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PrintCBF company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery company.

In the current year, PrintCBF company and Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PrintCBF company nor Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PrintCBF company nor Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PrintCBF company nor Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery company nor PrintCBF company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery nor PrintCBF holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery company nor PrintCBF company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PrintCBF company employs more people globally than Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery nor PrintCBF holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery nor PrintCBF holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery nor PrintCBF holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery nor PrintCBF holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery nor PrintCBF holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Metro Print Screen Printing & Embroidery nor PrintCBF holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References