Comparison Overview

Metro Inc.

VS

IKEA

Metro Inc.

11011 boul. Maurice-Duplessis, Montréal, H1C 1V6, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

With annual sales of more than $21 billion, METRO Inc. is a food and pharmacy leader in Québec and Ontario, providing employment to more than 97,000 people. Its purpose is to Nourish the health and well-being of our communities. As a retailer, franchisor, distributor, manufacturer, and provider of eCommerce services, the company operates or services a network of 995 food stores under several banners including Metro, Metro Plus, Super C, Food Basics, Adonis and Première Moisson, and some 640 pharmacies primarily under the Jean Coutu, Brunet, Metro Pharmacy and Food Basics Pharmacy banners. For more details, visit corpo.metro.ca

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 22,306
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IKEA

Olof Palmestraat 1, Delft, 2616, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

The IKEA vision is to create a better everyday life for the many people. Our business idea is to offer well-designed, functional and affordable, high-quality home furnishing, produced with care for people and the environment. The IKEA Brand unites more than 200.000 co-workers and hundreds of companies with different owners all over the world. It’s one brand, but it reaches millions of hearts and homes. Our value chain is unique. It includes everything from product development, design, supply, manufacture and sales – and of course it begins and ends with our customers. The IKEA retail business is operated through a franchise system. Today, 12 different groups of companies market and sell the IKEA product range under franchise agreements with Inter IKEA Systems B.V. Any jobs published on this page are offered by different companies operating under the IKEA Trademark.   IKEA was founded in Sweden in 1943.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 93,412
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metro-inc..jpeg
Metro Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ikea.jpeg
IKEA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Metro Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IKEA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metro Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IKEA in 2026.

Incident History — Metro Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metro Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IKEA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IKEA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metro-inc..jpeg
Metro Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ikea.jpeg
IKEA
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing emails
Blog: Blog

FAQ

IKEA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Metro Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

IKEA company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Metro Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, IKEA company and Metro Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IKEA company nor Metro Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

IKEA company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Metro Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

IKEA company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Metro Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Metro Inc. company nor IKEA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Metro Inc. nor IKEA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IKEA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Metro Inc. company.

IKEA company employs more people globally than Metro Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Metro Inc. nor IKEA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Metro Inc. nor IKEA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Metro Inc. nor IKEA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Metro Inc. nor IKEA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Metro Inc. nor IKEA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Metro Inc. nor IKEA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.