Comparison Overview

Metalloinvest

VS

Zijin Mining Group

Metalloinvest

28, Rublevskoye shosse, Moscow, Russia, 121609 Moscow, 121609, RU
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Metalloinvest is a leading global iron ore and HBI producer and supplier and one of the regional steel producers. Metalloinvest extracts and exploits iron ore fr om the second largest measured iron ore reserve base in the world with approximately 14.6 billion tonnes of proven and probable reserves on a JORC equivalent basis and about 150 years of reserve life. In 2012, according to CRU, the company was: - the leading producer of merchant HBI in the world - 40% share of the global market, - the third largest producer of pellets in the world, - the fifth largest commercial iron ore producer in the world. Metalloinvest is a global player in the production of iron ore products, processing the majority of its primary iron ore concentrate production into value-added products, such as iron ore pellets and HBI/DRI.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Zijin Mining Group

38/F, Tower B, AVIC ZIJIN PLAZA, 1811 Huandao East Road, Siming District, Xiamen, 361008, PRC Siming District Xiamen, Fujian 361016, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

Zijin Mining Group (紫金矿业集团) is an international mining company that currently runs various subsidiaries in 12 countries in Asia, Africa, Europe, South America, and Oceania. It is ranked No. 77 on Fortune's Top 500 Chinese Enterprises List in 2020 and No.778 on Forbes' Top 2000 Global Enterprises List in 2020. Our company has been persistently committed to employees' well-being, investors' interests, regional economic development, and sustainability. Originally founded as Zijinshan Gold Mine company in Fujian (China) in 1993, Zijin has been involved in the business of a variety of metals including gold, copper, zinc over the last two decades. It has become a leading mining group specialized in mining and metal refining in recent years, with projects and ventures spreading over 24 provinces in China and 10 + countries across the world. It is currently listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metalloinvest.jpeg
Metalloinvest
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zijin-mining-group.jpeg
Zijin Mining Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Metalloinvest
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zijin Mining Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metalloinvest in 2025.

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zijin Mining Group in 2025.

Incident History — Metalloinvest (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metalloinvest cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zijin Mining Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zijin Mining Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metalloinvest.jpeg
Metalloinvest
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zijin-mining-group.jpeg
Zijin Mining Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Zijin Mining Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Metalloinvest company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Zijin Mining Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Metalloinvest company.

In the current year, Zijin Mining Group company and Metalloinvest company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zijin Mining Group company nor Metalloinvest company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Zijin Mining Group company nor Metalloinvest company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Zijin Mining Group company nor Metalloinvest company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Metalloinvest company nor Zijin Mining Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Metalloinvest nor Zijin Mining Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Zijin Mining Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Metalloinvest company.

Both Metalloinvest company and Zijin Mining Group company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Metalloinvest nor Zijin Mining Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Metalloinvest nor Zijin Mining Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Metalloinvest nor Zijin Mining Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Metalloinvest nor Zijin Mining Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Metalloinvest nor Zijin Mining Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Metalloinvest nor Zijin Mining Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H