Comparison Overview

Metal Cutting Corporation

VS

TE-CO MANUFACTURING

Metal Cutting Corporation

89 Commerce Rd, Cedar Grove, NJ, 07009, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Metal Cutting Corporation is a precision metal fabricating company located in Cedar Grove, New Jersey, USA. We specialize in the burr-free abrasive cut-off of metal tubes, wires, rods and the related capabilities required to meet all of our customers'​ tight tolerance and high-precision requirements. We manufacture precision metal components for the medical device, automotive, electronic, biotechnology, semiconductor, aerospace, fiberoptic, electrical and general industries using abrasive cutting, grinding, lapping, polishing and related machining and metrology processes. Metal Cutting Corporation is the exclusive North American distributor for Nippon Tungsten Co., Ltd. tungsten products, including tungsten wire in all diameters, compositions, shapes and surface finishes, as well as various tungsten, hard metals, carbide and ceramic performance engineered products and materials. We have provided precision metal components since 1967. And for 43 years, we have continuously improved our products and processes. We have never lost sight of the simple fact that we do it for you. Meeting your quality, price and delivering requirements is what it is all about.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TE-CO MANUFACTURING

100 Quinter Farm Rd, None, Union, OH, US, 45322
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

TE-CO Manufacturing of Union, Ohio has a proud legacy as a leader in high-quality workholding solutions. Founded in 1926, the privately-owned company produces a wide range of clamping components, CMM fixturing and gaging, spring-loaded devices, hoist rings, Toolex and Raptor brand vises, tooling plates and columns, and much more. TE-CO products are available through a network of industrial distributors. The company is ISO 9001: 2015 certified and manufacturing is performed in a modern 75,000-square-foot facility using state-of-the-art CNC lathes, machining centers, and grinding equipment, with engineering support and programming provided by a team of experienced toolmakers utilizing the latest CAD/CAM software. Need a secure, accurate grip? At TE-CO, we don’t let go.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metal-cutting-corporation.jpeg
Metal Cutting Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/te-co-workholding.jpeg
TE-CO MANUFACTURING
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Metal Cutting Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TE-CO MANUFACTURING
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metal Cutting Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TE-CO MANUFACTURING in 2025.

Incident History — Metal Cutting Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metal Cutting Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TE-CO MANUFACTURING (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TE-CO MANUFACTURING cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metal-cutting-corporation.jpeg
Metal Cutting Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/te-co-workholding.jpeg
TE-CO MANUFACTURING
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Metal Cutting Corporation company and TE-CO MANUFACTURING company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, TE-CO MANUFACTURING company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Metal Cutting Corporation company.

In the current year, TE-CO MANUFACTURING company and Metal Cutting Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TE-CO MANUFACTURING company nor Metal Cutting Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TE-CO MANUFACTURING company nor Metal Cutting Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TE-CO MANUFACTURING company nor Metal Cutting Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Metal Cutting Corporation company nor TE-CO MANUFACTURING company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Metal Cutting Corporation nor TE-CO MANUFACTURING holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Metal Cutting Corporation company nor TE-CO MANUFACTURING company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TE-CO MANUFACTURING company employs more people globally than Metal Cutting Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Metal Cutting Corporation nor TE-CO MANUFACTURING holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Metal Cutting Corporation nor TE-CO MANUFACTURING holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Metal Cutting Corporation nor TE-CO MANUFACTURING holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Metal Cutting Corporation nor TE-CO MANUFACTURING holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Metal Cutting Corporation nor TE-CO MANUFACTURING holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Metal Cutting Corporation nor TE-CO MANUFACTURING holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H