Comparison Overview

META Foundation

VS

Observer Research Foundation America

META Foundation

6 Saint Johns Ln, New York, New York, 10013, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

The META foundation explores sustainable and impactful approaches to foster engagement and decentralized communities across industries, leveraging a hospitality lens and harnessing the potential of AI, VR/AR, Web3 technologies, and spatial computing. In partnerships with governments, universities and technologists, the foundation currently operates community projects in the USA, Peru, Chile, Bhutan, with France, Morocco and Lebanon on the horizon.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Observer Research Foundation America

Washington, DC, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

The Observer Research Foundation America (ORF America) is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in Washington DC dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the United States, India, and their partners in a rapidly changing world. ORF America produces research, curates diverse and inclusive platforms, and develops networks for cooperation between the developed and developing worlds based on common values and shared interests. Its areas of focus are international affairs and security, technology policy, energy and climate, and economic development. Established in 2020, ORF America is an overseas affiliate of the Observer Research Foundation (ORF), India’s premier non-government think tank.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta-ngo.jpeg
META Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/observer-research-foundation-america.jpeg
Observer Research Foundation America
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
META Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Observer Research Foundation America
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for META Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

Observer Research Foundation America has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — META Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

META Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Observer Research Foundation America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Observer Research Foundation America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta-ngo.jpeg
META Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/observer-research-foundation-america.jpeg
Observer Research Foundation America
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malicious JavaScript (Themes.js), Legitimate Services Abuse (GitHub, Median News subdomains), Scheduled Task Persistence, Social Engineering (E-CARD.docx decoy)
Motivation: Espionage, Potential Ransomware Deployment, High-Value Target Reconnaissance
Blog: Blog

FAQ

META Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Observer Research Foundation America company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Observer Research Foundation America company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas META Foundation company has not reported any.

In the current year, Observer Research Foundation America company has reported more cyber incidents than META Foundation company.

Neither Observer Research Foundation America company nor META Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Observer Research Foundation America company nor META Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Observer Research Foundation America company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while META Foundation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither META Foundation company nor Observer Research Foundation America company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither META Foundation nor Observer Research Foundation America holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither META Foundation company nor Observer Research Foundation America company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Observer Research Foundation America company employs more people globally than META Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither META Foundation nor Observer Research Foundation America holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither META Foundation nor Observer Research Foundation America holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither META Foundation nor Observer Research Foundation America holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither META Foundation nor Observer Research Foundation America holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither META Foundation nor Observer Research Foundation America holds HIPAA certification.

Neither META Foundation nor Observer Research Foundation America holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X