Comparison Overview

META Foundation

VS

The Conference Board of Canada Events

META Foundation

6 Saint Johns Ln, New York, New York, 10013, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.meta.ngo

The META foundation explores sustainable and impactful approaches to foster engagement and decentralized communities across industries, leveraging a hospitality lens and harnessing the potential of AI, VR/AR, Web3 technologies, and spatial computing. In partnerships with governments, universities and technologists, the foundation currently operates community projects in the USA, Peru, Chile, Bhutan, with France, Morocco and Lebanon on the horizon.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Conference Board of Canada Events

255 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8M7, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
http://www.conferenceboard.ca/conf/default.aspx

At the Conference Board, we believe that the open and honest exchange of opinion can lead to real change—in national priority, public policy, and business strategy. By sharing insights on economic trends, public policy issues, and organizational performance, we can help you to succeed. Our events provide a forum for collaboration with respected leaders and the opportunity to engage in networking discussions with your peers. Your participation will help you to build partnerships and relationships with key decision makers at these unparalleled learning experiences. Conference Board events are held throughout the year and across the country, allowing you the flexibility to attend conferences in the location of your choice, at the time you need it. Be sure to have a look at our conference calendar for our next event near you: http://www.conferenceboard.ca/conf/default.aspx.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta-ngo.jpeg
META Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conference-board-of-canada-events.jpeg
The Conference Board of Canada Events
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
META Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Conference Board of Canada Events
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for META Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Conference Board of Canada Events in 2025.

Incident History — META Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

META Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Conference Board of Canada Events (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Conference Board of Canada Events cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta-ngo.jpeg
META Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conference-board-of-canada-events.jpeg
The Conference Board of Canada Events
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Conference Board of Canada Events company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to META Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Conference Board of Canada Events company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to META Foundation company.

In the current year, The Conference Board of Canada Events company and META Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Conference Board of Canada Events company nor META Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Conference Board of Canada Events company nor META Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Conference Board of Canada Events company nor META Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither META Foundation company nor The Conference Board of Canada Events company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither META Foundation nor The Conference Board of Canada Events holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Conference Board of Canada Events company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to META Foundation company.

Neither META Foundation nor The Conference Board of Canada Events holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither META Foundation nor The Conference Board of Canada Events holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither META Foundation nor The Conference Board of Canada Events holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither META Foundation nor The Conference Board of Canada Events holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither META Foundation nor The Conference Board of Canada Events holds HIPAA certification.

Neither META Foundation nor The Conference Board of Canada Events holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References