Comparison Overview

Meta Marketing Agency

VS

SEO

Meta Marketing Agency

1800 Wazee St, Denver, Colorado, undefined, US
Last Update: 2024-08-14 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Meta Marketing Agency is a social media directed agency that provides its customers with social audits, marketing strategies, content and ad development, along with many more social exposure and reputation management services.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SEO

undefined, Melbourne, VIC, 3121, AU
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Itโ€™s been over 15 years since SEO.com.au started, and weโ€™re proud to say we lead the way because weโ€™ve got the experience and the talent to get you great results. What makes us work? Quite honestly, itโ€™s the relationships we build with our clients that let us achieve what your business needs. Directors James Richardson and Daniel Zuccon head up a ten-person team of SEO specialists who facilitate all work in-house. Weโ€™re far too protective of our work to outsource, and besides, the days when you could apply the same โ€˜secret SEO formulaโ€™ to every website are far behind us. Thatโ€™s why weโ€™ve hired a diverse team of professionals with skills in Web Development, Public Relations, Copywriting, Account Management and Digital Marketing. This allows us to have a complete understanding of your unique marketing requirements and to make sure that our work delivers a real return on investment.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,293
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta-marketing-agency.jpeg
Meta Marketing Agency
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seo.jpeg
SEO
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Meta Marketing Agency
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SEO
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meta Marketing Agency in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SEO in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Meta Marketing Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meta Marketing Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” SEO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SEO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta-marketing-agency.jpeg
Meta Marketing Agency
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seo.jpeg
SEO
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Meta Marketing Agency company and SEO company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, SEO company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Meta Marketing Agency company.

In the current year, SEO company and Meta Marketing Agency company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SEO company nor Meta Marketing Agency company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SEO company nor Meta Marketing Agency company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SEO company nor Meta Marketing Agency company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Meta Marketing Agency company nor SEO company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Meta Marketing Agency company nor SEO company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SEO company employs more people globally than Meta Marketing Agency company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X