Comparison Overview

Messenger Theatre Company

VS

Georgetown Palace Theatre

Messenger Theatre Company

New York, NY, US, 10040
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://messengertheatreco.org

Messenger Theatre Company is dedicated to the place where mythical meets modern. We create original collaborative works featuring physical theatre, masks, puppetry, live music and visual arts. We explore old stories through contemporary lenses and create new stories with classical structures. In every form, we pursue magic, wit and beauty.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Georgetown Palace Theatre

810 S Austin Ave, Georgetown, TX 78626, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.georgetownpalace.com

The Georgetown Palace Theatre celebrates the power of storytelling and our shared human experience with a commitment to artistic excellence, quality education, and community engagement and seeks to become the cultural destination for everyone. We are a nonprofit organization dedicated to enhancing the quality of life in Central Texas by providing a venue for quality and affordable entertainment and educational opportunities in the performing arts. We produce a diverse lineup of fully-staged plays and musicals throughout the season. We have an Adaptive Theatre for All Program as well as numerous summer camps and educational theatre classes. At the Palace, we strive to provide performance and education experiences for each and every community member. See you at the Palace!

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/messenger-theatre-company.jpeg
Messenger Theatre Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgetown-palace-theatre.jpeg
Georgetown Palace Theatre
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Messenger Theatre Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Georgetown Palace Theatre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Messenger Theatre Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Georgetown Palace Theatre in 2025.

Incident History — Messenger Theatre Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Messenger Theatre Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Georgetown Palace Theatre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Georgetown Palace Theatre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/messenger-theatre-company.jpeg
Messenger Theatre Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgetown-palace-theatre.jpeg
Georgetown Palace Theatre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Georgetown Palace Theatre company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Messenger Theatre Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Georgetown Palace Theatre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Messenger Theatre Company company.

In the current year, Georgetown Palace Theatre company and Messenger Theatre Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Georgetown Palace Theatre company nor Messenger Theatre Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Georgetown Palace Theatre company nor Messenger Theatre Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Georgetown Palace Theatre company nor Messenger Theatre Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Messenger Theatre Company company nor Georgetown Palace Theatre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Messenger Theatre Company nor Georgetown Palace Theatre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Messenger Theatre Company company nor Georgetown Palace Theatre company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Georgetown Palace Theatre company employs more people globally than Messenger Theatre Company company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Messenger Theatre Company nor Georgetown Palace Theatre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Messenger Theatre Company nor Georgetown Palace Theatre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Messenger Theatre Company nor Georgetown Palace Theatre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Messenger Theatre Company nor Georgetown Palace Theatre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Messenger Theatre Company nor Georgetown Palace Theatre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Messenger Theatre Company nor Georgetown Palace Theatre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A weakness has been identified in itsourcecode Online Pet Shop Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /pet1/addcnp.php. This manipulation of the argument cnpname causes sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda AX9 22.03.01.46. This affects the function image_check of the component httpd. The manipulation results in use of weak hash. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.6
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A weakness has been identified in code-projects Student File Management System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/update_student.php. This manipulation of the argument stud_id causes sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in code-projects Student File Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin/save_user.php. The manipulation of the argument firstname results in sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in code-projects Student File Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /admin/update_user.php. The manipulation of the argument user_id leads to sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References