Comparison Overview

Studio MESH

VS

Studio P+P

Studio MESH

609 Tennessee Ave, Charleston, West Virginia, 25302, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

MESH is your full service communication design and tech studio. We make brands, websites, print works, digital media, objects, and other fun stuff to share your good ideas. Our work promotes greater equity, playful education, healthy living, creative entrepreneurship, creative technology, local economies, and good old-fashioned fun. We work with creative and social entrepreneurs and nonprofit organizations to build brands, digital experiences and communication tools that improve the way we all live. meshfresh.com

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Studio P+P

Blackfriars Road, London, London, SE18EQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Studio P+P - Polina Dyer is a London-based designer with over ten year’s experience in creative direction, visual identity developing and branding for different scales of businesses. Created to drive businesses connected with the ‘high-end market’- Real Estate, Fashion, Beauty, Culture, Design and Art. Polina enjoys working on a diversity of projects and sees challenges as a force for growth. Polina creates intelligent design solutions, which reflect each clients’ personality, be it experimental or minimal. This is achieved using an accurate, methodical approach with every aspect of the project in mind.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mesh-design-and-development.jpeg
Studio MESH
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-pplusp.jpeg
Studio P+P
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Studio MESH
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Studio P+P
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio MESH in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio P+P in 2025.

Incident History — Studio MESH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio MESH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Studio P+P (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio P+P cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mesh-design-and-development.jpeg
Studio MESH
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-pplusp.jpeg
Studio P+P
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Studio MESH company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Studio P+P company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Studio P+P company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Studio MESH company.

In the current year, Studio P+P company and Studio MESH company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Studio P+P company nor Studio MESH company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Studio P+P company nor Studio MESH company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Studio P+P company nor Studio MESH company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Studio MESH company nor Studio P+P company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Studio MESH nor Studio P+P holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Studio MESH company nor Studio P+P company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Studio MESH company employs more people globally than Studio P+P company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Studio MESH nor Studio P+P holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Studio MESH nor Studio P+P holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Studio MESH nor Studio P+P holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Studio MESH nor Studio P+P holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Studio MESH nor Studio P+P holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Studio MESH nor Studio P+P holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X