Comparison Overview

Mesa Label Express

VS

Salt 1to1 Inc.

Mesa Label Express

13400 Danielson Street, Suite B, Poway, CA 92064, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mesalabel.com

Mesa Label Express, Inc. was founded in 1989. Since our inception the vision and values of our founders have enabled us to provide our customers with the highest level of quality and superior customer service at very competitive pricing. We are a family owned and operated company providing superior customer experiences locally as well as across North America. With our complete in-house production facility, we are capable of delivering high quality labels for any application. We have worked with numerous customers in a variety of industries including food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, health and beauty. We believe that our extensive experience in these industries allows us to meet all the labeling needs of our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Salt 1to1 Inc.

11221 John Wycliffe Blvd, Orlando, FL, 32832, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.salt1to1.com

Salt 1to1, Inc. specializes in personalized communications. Historically, this has been in print, but we are currently expanding to include video, promotional products, with future expansions planned. Our focus has been to come along side ministry organizations (from individual missionaries to small local churches to large international ministries) and assist them in their communication efforts. Very strong in the areas of print and mail, direct mail campaigns, creative ideas to get your name and individual brand out to your partners, we offer a variety of methods to help you communicate more effectively with your ministry partners. Strategic alliances with vendors across the country mean that we can find the best source and outlet for your projects if we are unable to do it ourselves. This expansion gives us access to all forms of print, specialized operations (foiling, engraving, unusual bindery requirements, etc.). Printing is covered from paper to billboards, wearables, promotional products, specialty items.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mesa-label-express.jpeg
Mesa Label Express
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salt-1to1-inc..jpeg
Salt 1to1 Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mesa Label Express
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Salt 1to1 Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mesa Label Express in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Salt 1to1 Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Mesa Label Express (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mesa Label Express cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Salt 1to1 Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Salt 1to1 Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mesa-label-express.jpeg
Mesa Label Express
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salt-1to1-inc..jpeg
Salt 1to1 Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Salt 1to1 Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mesa Label Express company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Salt 1to1 Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mesa Label Express company.

In the current year, Salt 1to1 Inc. company and Mesa Label Express company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Salt 1to1 Inc. company nor Mesa Label Express company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Salt 1to1 Inc. company nor Mesa Label Express company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Salt 1to1 Inc. company nor Mesa Label Express company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mesa Label Express company nor Salt 1to1 Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mesa Label Express nor Salt 1to1 Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mesa Label Express company nor Salt 1to1 Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mesa Label Express company employs more people globally than Salt 1to1 Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Mesa Label Express nor Salt 1to1 Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mesa Label Express nor Salt 1to1 Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mesa Label Express nor Salt 1to1 Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mesa Label Express nor Salt 1to1 Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mesa Label Express nor Salt 1to1 Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mesa Label Express nor Salt 1to1 Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References