Comparison Overview

Meru Health

VS

EMQ FamiliesFirst

Meru Health

720 S B St, San Mateo, California, 94401, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

At Meru Health, our mission is deeply personal. Founded in 2016 after losing loved ones to mental health challenges, our founders witnessed firsthand the significant gaps in access to effective care that drives long-lasting results. Their experiences highlighted a crucial truth: mental health issues are often intertwined with physical health. The impact of nutrition, sleep, and breathing on mood and physical well being—and vice versa—is well documented, yet many mental health services continue to overlook this vital connection. Traditional talk therapy and psychiatric treatments alone aren’t sufficient for most people. That’s why our digital 12-week program is proven to treat mild to severe symptoms of stress, depression, anxiety, burnout and more. Addressing the mind and body, it includes scheduled video calls and unlimited chatting with a therapist plus on-demand wellness practices, heart rate variability (HRV) therapy and anonymous community support—all from an easy-to-use app. The result? 2X better outcomes than traditional therapy. This is why we’re dedicated to creating a new standard in mental health care.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EMQ FamiliesFirst

251 Llewellyn Ave, Campbell, 95008-1940, US
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

About EMQ FamiliesFirst is one of the largest, most comprehensive mental health treatment programs in the country. The agency takes a state-of-the-art approach to children and youth with complex behavioral health challenges: we combine research-based services (including evidence-based therapies and psychiatric services) with a family-centered effort to identify and address the complex needs of the family. Our results for youth are on average 10 percentage points higher when compared to state or national averages on metrics such as living at home, staying in school and out of trouble. Our Mission We do whatever it takes to help children, strengthen families, build community, and advocate for systems change to ensure that our families thrive. Locations Serving over 30 counties in California, the agency is headquartered in Campbell, with offices in San Jose, Los Gatos, Fairfield, Concord, Davis, Sacramento, Fresno, San Bernardino, and Los Angeles. Employment / Jobs We’re hiring for the following positions: Family Partner (Los Angeles) Business Systems Analyst II – Financial Systems (Campbell, CA) Business Systems Analyst II (Campbell, CA) Nurse Manager – Crisis Stabilization Unit (Campbell, CA) Licensed Psychiatric Technician/ Licensed Vocational Nurse – Crisis Stabilization Unit (Campbell, CA) Rehabilitation Specialist – Crisis Stabilization Unit (Campbell, CA) Clinician – Crisis Stabilization Unit (Campbell, CA) Apply online and find more open positions at http://emqff.org/employment/ . EOE

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 306
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meru-health.jpeg
Meru Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emq-familiesfirst.jpeg
EMQ FamiliesFirst
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Meru Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EMQ FamiliesFirst
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meru Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EMQ FamiliesFirst in 2026.

Incident History — Meru Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meru Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EMQ FamiliesFirst (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EMQ FamiliesFirst cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meru-health.jpeg
Meru Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emq-familiesfirst.jpeg
EMQ FamiliesFirst
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EMQ FamiliesFirst company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Meru Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, EMQ FamiliesFirst company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Meru Health company.

In the current year, EMQ FamiliesFirst company and Meru Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EMQ FamiliesFirst company nor Meru Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EMQ FamiliesFirst company nor Meru Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EMQ FamiliesFirst company nor Meru Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Meru Health company nor EMQ FamiliesFirst company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Meru Health nor EMQ FamiliesFirst holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Meru Health company nor EMQ FamiliesFirst company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

EMQ FamiliesFirst company employs more people globally than Meru Health company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Meru Health nor EMQ FamiliesFirst holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Meru Health nor EMQ FamiliesFirst holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Meru Health nor EMQ FamiliesFirst holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Meru Health nor EMQ FamiliesFirst holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Meru Health nor EMQ FamiliesFirst holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Meru Health nor EMQ FamiliesFirst holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N