Comparison Overview

Mercy

VS

Molina Healthcare

Mercy

15740 South Outer Forty Road, None, Chesterfield, Missouri, US, 63017
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Mercy, one of the 15 largest U.S. health systems and named the top large system in the U.S. for excellent patient experience by NRC Health, serves millions annually with nationally recognized care and one of the nation’s largest and highest performing Accountable Care Organizations in quality and cost. Mercy is a highly integrated, multi-state health care system including 50 acute care and specialty (heart, children’s, orthopedic and rehab) hospitals, convenient and urgent care locations, imaging centers and pharmacies. Mercy has over 1,000 physician practice locations and outpatient facilities, more than 5,000 physicians and advanced practitioners and more than 50,000 co-workers serving patients and families across Arkansas, Illinois, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma. Mercy also has clinics, outpatient services and outreach ministries in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. In fiscal year 2024 alone, Mercy provided nearly half a billion dollars of free care and other community benefits, including traditional charity care and unreimbursed Medicaid.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 28,945
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Molina Healthcare

200 Oceangate, Long Beach, California, US, 90802
Last Update: 2025-12-19

Molina Healthcare is a FORTUNE 500 company that is focused exclusively on government-sponsored health care programs for families and individuals who qualify for government sponsored health care. Molina Healthcare contracts with state governments and serves as a health plan providing a wide range of quality health care services to families and individuals. Molina Healthcare offers health plans in Arizona, California, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. Molina also offers a Medicare product and has been selected in several states to participate in duals demonstration projects to manage the care for those eligible for both Medicaid and Medicare.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 17,236
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercy.jpeg
Mercy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/molina-healthcare.jpeg
Molina Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mercy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Molina Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mercy in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Molina Healthcare in 2025.

Incident History — Mercy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Molina Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Molina Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercy.jpeg
Mercy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/molina-healthcare.jpeg
Molina Healthcare
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2017
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of a Security Flaw
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Mercy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Molina Healthcare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Molina Healthcare company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Mercy company has not reported any.

In the current year, Molina Healthcare company and Mercy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Molina Healthcare company nor Mercy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Molina Healthcare company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Mercy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Molina Healthcare company nor Mercy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Molina Healthcare company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Mercy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mercy nor Molina Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mercy company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Molina Healthcare company.

Mercy company employs more people globally than Molina Healthcare company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Mercy nor Molina Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mercy nor Molina Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mercy nor Molina Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mercy nor Molina Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mercy nor Molina Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mercy nor Molina Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N