Comparison Overview

Mercy Health Foundation

VS

Clothes For Charity

Mercy Health Foundation

Richmond, Victoria, AU, 3121
Last Update: 2025-12-21

Mercy Health Foundation supports Mercy Health to advance care and improve life outcomes for people in need. Since it was established in 2006, Mercy Health Foundation has worked closely with our many varied donors, including large philanthropic and family donors, corporate partners, event participants, community fundraisers and Mercy Health staff. The Foundation has distributed more than $6 million to a range of essential projects. Among the many initiatives we support, the Foundation has contributed to the Sheila Handbury Chair of Maternal Fetal Medicine, the Mercy Health Breastmilk Bank, innovative equipment in areas such as Special Care Nurseries, sensory gardens for some of Mercy Health’s aged care residents, and aged care research projects. The Foundation operates as a not-for-profit organisation, and is the Trustee for the Mercy Health Foundation Fund. The Foundation is governed by a Board of Directors appointed by Mercy Health and the Institute of Sisters of Mercy of Australia and Papua New Guinea.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Clothes For Charity

Unit 2, Leeds, LS11 5TQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-21

At Clothes for Charity, we know that donating clothes is an essential way for charities to raise funds and we want to help people to trust this way of donating again. Our aim is to provide a secure, simple and convenient way for individuals to donate their clothes and support their charity of choice – with trackable donation bags, professional collections and email confirmation that the donation reached its destination. We welcome all new charity partners so please feel free to get in touch to find out more - [email protected]

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercy-health-foundation-aus.jpeg
Mercy Health Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clothes-for-charity.jpeg
Clothes For Charity
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mercy Health Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Clothes For Charity
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mercy Health Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clothes For Charity in 2025.

Incident History — Mercy Health Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercy Health Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Clothes For Charity (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clothes For Charity cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercy-health-foundation-aus.jpeg
Mercy Health Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clothes-for-charity.jpeg
Clothes For Charity
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Clothes For Charity company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mercy Health Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Clothes For Charity company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mercy Health Foundation company.

In the current year, Clothes For Charity company and Mercy Health Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Clothes For Charity company nor Mercy Health Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Clothes For Charity company nor Mercy Health Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Clothes For Charity company nor Mercy Health Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mercy Health Foundation company nor Clothes For Charity company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mercy Health Foundation nor Clothes For Charity holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mercy Health Foundation company nor Clothes For Charity company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mercy Health Foundation company employs more people globally than Clothes For Charity company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Mercy Health Foundation nor Clothes For Charity holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mercy Health Foundation nor Clothes For Charity holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mercy Health Foundation nor Clothes For Charity holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mercy Health Foundation nor Clothes For Charity holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mercy Health Foundation nor Clothes For Charity holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mercy Health Foundation nor Clothes For Charity holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N