Comparison Overview

Mercer County District Library

VS

Allegany County Library System

Mercer County District Library

303 N Main St, Celina, Ohio, 45822, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

The Mercer County District Library strives to be an integral part of the community it serves by providing materials and services for residents of all ages for personal enrichment, enjoyment, and educational needs. The library is dedicated to providing timely and practical access to all forms of media. The educational needs of the community will be supported with adult programming as well as programs developed to stimulate children’s interests and appreciation for reading and learning.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Allegany County Library System

31 Washington Street, Cumberland, MD, 21502, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Allegany County Library System operates six branches—Washington Street in Cumberland, Frostburg, South Cumberland, LaVale, George’s Creek, and Westernport. It also has a bookmobile that travels the county serving elementary schools, nursing homes, and outlying areas. We offer public technology training as well as a circulating collection of books, large print materials, magazines, videos, films, and books on tape. Each branch subscribes to numerous local, state, and national newspapers and provides computers for accessing the Internet.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercer-county-district-library.jpeg
Mercer County District Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allegany-county-library-system.jpeg
Allegany County Library System
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mercer County District Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Allegany County Library System
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mercer County District Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allegany County Library System in 2025.

Incident History — Mercer County District Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercer County District Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Allegany County Library System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allegany County Library System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercer-county-district-library.jpeg
Mercer County District Library
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allegany-county-library-system.jpeg
Allegany County Library System
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mercer County District Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Allegany County Library System company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Allegany County Library System company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mercer County District Library company.

In the current year, Allegany County Library System company and Mercer County District Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Allegany County Library System company nor Mercer County District Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Allegany County Library System company nor Mercer County District Library company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Allegany County Library System company nor Mercer County District Library company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mercer County District Library company nor Allegany County Library System company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mercer County District Library nor Allegany County Library System holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mercer County District Library company nor Allegany County Library System company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Allegany County Library System company employs more people globally than Mercer County District Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Mercer County District Library nor Allegany County Library System holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mercer County District Library nor Allegany County Library System holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mercer County District Library nor Allegany County Library System holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mercer County District Library nor Allegany County Library System holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mercer County District Library nor Allegany County Library System holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mercer County District Library nor Allegany County Library System holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H