Comparison Overview

Mercedes-Benz USA

VS

Volvo Trucks

Mercedes-Benz USA

303 Perimeter Center North, Atlanta, GA, US, 30346
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA), a Daimler Company, is responsible for the Distribution and Marketing of Mercedes-Benz and smart products in the United States. MBUSA was founded in 1965 and prior to that Mercedes-Benz cars were sold in the United States by Mercedes-Benz Car Sales, Inc., a subsidiary of the Studebaker-Packard corporation. Today MBUSA has over 300 dealerships with more than 1400 employees. For employment opportunities please visit: http://bit.ly/2tFzlOV. For information on how to get the most out of your Mercedes-Benz vehicle, visit the Owners'​ Support instructional videos section of our site: http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/owners/videos

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 11,599
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Volvo Trucks

Herkulesgatan 75, Gothenburg, Sweden, SE, 405 08
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Volvo Trucks supplies complete transport solutions for discerning professional customers with its full range of medium- and heavy-duty trucks. Customer support is provided via a global network of dealers with 2,200 service points in about 130 countries. Volvo trucks are assembled in 12 countries across the globe. In 2024 approximately 134,000 Volvo trucks were delivered worldwide. Volvo Trucks is part of the Volvo Group, one of the world’s leading manufacturers of trucks, buses, construction equipment and marine and industrial engines. The group also provides complete solutions for financing and service. Volvo Trucks’ work is based on the core values of quality, safety and environmental care.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 12,312
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercedes-benz-usa.jpeg
Mercedes-Benz USA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/volvo-trucks.jpeg
Volvo Trucks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mercedes-Benz USA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Volvo Trucks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mercedes-Benz USA in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Volvo Trucks in 2025.

Incident History — Mercedes-Benz USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercedes-Benz USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Volvo Trucks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Volvo Trucks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercedes-benz-usa.jpeg
Mercedes-Benz USA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/volvo-trucks.jpeg
Volvo Trucks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mercedes-Benz USA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Volvo Trucks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Volvo Trucks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mercedes-Benz USA company.

In the current year, Volvo Trucks company and Mercedes-Benz USA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Volvo Trucks company nor Mercedes-Benz USA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Volvo Trucks company nor Mercedes-Benz USA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Volvo Trucks company nor Mercedes-Benz USA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mercedes-Benz USA company nor Volvo Trucks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mercedes-Benz USA nor Volvo Trucks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mercedes-Benz USA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Volvo Trucks company.

Volvo Trucks company employs more people globally than Mercedes-Benz USA company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Mercedes-Benz USA nor Volvo Trucks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mercedes-Benz USA nor Volvo Trucks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mercedes-Benz USA nor Volvo Trucks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mercedes-Benz USA nor Volvo Trucks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mercedes-Benz USA nor Volvo Trucks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mercedes-Benz USA nor Volvo Trucks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H