Comparison Overview

Mercedes-Benz Group AG

VS

Royal Enfield

Mercedes-Benz Group AG

Stuttgart, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-22

Learn more about Mercedes-Benz, its products, innovations and our world! Data privacy: mb4.me/provider Imprint: Mercedes-Benz AG Mercedesstraße 120 D-70372 Stuttgart Deutschland Tel.: +49 7 11 17-0 E-Mail: [email protected] Vertreten durch den Vorstand: Ola Källenius (Vorsitzender), Jörg Burzer, Renata Jungo Brüngger, Sabine Kohleisen, Harald Wilhelm, Markus Schäfer, Britta Seeger Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Bernd Pischetsrieder Handelsregister beim Amtsgericht Stuttgart, Nr. HRB 762873 Umsatzsteueridentifikationsnummer: DE321281763

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 2,032
Subsidiaries: 27
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Royal Enfield

Eicher Motors, #96, Sector 32,, Gurgaon, Haryana -, 122001, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-17

The oldest motorcycle brand in continuous production, Royal Enfield made its first motorcycle in 1901. A division of Eicher Motors Limited, Royal Enfield has created the mid-sized motorcycle segment in India with its unique and distinctive modern classic bikes. Royal Enfield operates in 60+ countries across the world with more than 3000 retail touch points globally, 5 CKD units (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Nepal, & Thailand), 3 state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities based out of Chennai, India and two technical centers - in India and in the UK. Watch Royal Enfield's incredible journey here - https://youtu.be/UvR57lwJptk

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 17,284
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercedes-benz-group-ag.jpeg
Mercedes-Benz Group AG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-enfield.jpeg
Royal Enfield
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mercedes-Benz Group AG
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Royal Enfield
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Mercedes-Benz Group AG has 44.93% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Enfield in 2025.

Incident History — Mercedes-Benz Group AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercedes-Benz Group AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Royal Enfield (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Enfield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercedes-benz-group-ag.jpeg
Mercedes-Benz Group AG
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Application Vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-enfield.jpeg
Royal Enfield
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mercedes-Benz Group AG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Royal Enfield company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mercedes-Benz Group AG company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Royal Enfield company has not reported any.

In the current year, Mercedes-Benz Group AG company has reported more cyber incidents than Royal Enfield company.

Neither Royal Enfield company nor Mercedes-Benz Group AG company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Royal Enfield company nor Mercedes-Benz Group AG company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Royal Enfield company nor Mercedes-Benz Group AG company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Mercedes-Benz Group AG company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Royal Enfield company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mercedes-Benz Group AG nor Royal Enfield holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mercedes-Benz Group AG company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Royal Enfield company.

Royal Enfield company employs more people globally than Mercedes-Benz Group AG company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Mercedes-Benz Group AG nor Royal Enfield holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mercedes-Benz Group AG nor Royal Enfield holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mercedes-Benz Group AG nor Royal Enfield holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mercedes-Benz Group AG nor Royal Enfield holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mercedes-Benz Group AG nor Royal Enfield holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mercedes-Benz Group AG nor Royal Enfield holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability has been found in SeaCMS up to 13.3. The affected element is an unknown function of the file js/player/dmplayer/dmku/class/mysqli.class.php. Such manipulation of the argument page/limit leads to sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in HappyDevs TempTool allows Stored XSS.This issue affects TempTool: from n/a through 1.3.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Tormorten WP Microdata allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Microdata: from n/a through 1.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere vulnerability in HappyDevs TempTool allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects TempTool: from n/a through 1.3.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda FH1201 1.2.0.14(408). Affected is the function sprintf of the file /goform/SetIpBind. Such manipulation of the argument page leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X