Comparison Overview

Mental Health Center of Denver

VS

Peachford Hospital

Mental Health Center of Denver

4141 East Dickenson Place, Denver, Colorado, 80222, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

WellPower is the national leader in redefining the way mental health is addressed in our community. As a private, not-for-profit community mental health center, we strive to create a supportive, inclusive environment that helps people flourish. Our work focuses on the strengths and well-being of the people we serve. Last year, we provided treatment, prevention, outreach and crisis services to more than 60,000 children, families and adults in Denver. The Mental Health Center of Denver has been recognized as one of the Denver Post’s Top Workplaces for the past six years. We believe everyone wants to be great, and we provide a place where people can do what they do best every day. Our Mission: Enriching Lives and Minds by Focusing on Strengths and Well Being Recent Recognition: Check out recent mentions of the Mental Health Center of Denver in the news at mhcd.org/news.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 645
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Peachford Hospital

2151 Peachford Rd, Atlanta, 30338-6534, US
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

Peachford Hospital, Atlanta’s behavioral health and addictive disease treatment facility, has been providing care to patients with mental health and addictive needs since 1973. Our 246-bed facility offers a compassionate, safe and nurturing environment for children, adolescents, adults and seniors to find hope and healing from emotional, psychiatric and addictive diseases. Our 45 years of success is a direct result of our 650+ compassionate and caring employees. Peachford hires the most experienced mental health clinicians and professionals including registered nurses, therapists, social workers and mental health technicians to provide compassionate care to our patients. If you are interested in being a part of our team, apply online at www.peachford.com/careers. Our patients benefit from individualized treatment plans tailored to their unique needs. Interdisciplinary teams work to find the tools needed to enable our patients to build healthy and positive lives. Throughout the treatment experience, we work with our patients and their families to encourage the best possible outcomes and build plans for success. Our newly renovated facility offers inpatient, partial hospitalization and intensive outpatient programs including off-campus, short-term housing for adults participating in our partial hospitalization or intensive outpatient programs. Our Assessment Team provides no-cost evaluations via walk-in appointments or scheduled referrals, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You may speak with a masters prepared assessment counselor by calling 770-454-2302. Our parent company, Universal Health Services (UHS), is one of the nation’s most respected hospital companies. UHS has has been named one of the World’s Most Admired Companies by Fortune. UHS has 82,000+ employees and operates 325+ acute care hospitals, behavioral health facilities and ambulatory centers in the US, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and the United Kingdom.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 274
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mental-health-center-of-denver.jpeg
Mental Health Center of Denver
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peachford-behavioral-health.jpeg
Peachford Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mental Health Center of Denver
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Peachford Hospital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mental Health Center of Denver in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peachford Hospital in 2026.

Incident History — Mental Health Center of Denver (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mental Health Center of Denver cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Peachford Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peachford Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mental-health-center-of-denver.jpeg
Mental Health Center of Denver
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peachford-behavioral-health.jpeg
Peachford Hospital
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mental Health Center of Denver company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Peachford Hospital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Peachford Hospital company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mental Health Center of Denver company.

In the current year, Peachford Hospital company and Mental Health Center of Denver company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Peachford Hospital company nor Mental Health Center of Denver company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Peachford Hospital company nor Mental Health Center of Denver company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Peachford Hospital company nor Mental Health Center of Denver company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mental Health Center of Denver company nor Peachford Hospital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mental Health Center of Denver nor Peachford Hospital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mental Health Center of Denver company nor Peachford Hospital company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mental Health Center of Denver company employs more people globally than Peachford Hospital company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Mental Health Center of Denver nor Peachford Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mental Health Center of Denver nor Peachford Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mental Health Center of Denver nor Peachford Hospital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mental Health Center of Denver nor Peachford Hospital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mental Health Center of Denver nor Peachford Hospital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mental Health Center of Denver nor Peachford Hospital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N