Comparison Overview

Menokin Foundation

VS

Museums at Washington and Lee

Menokin Foundation

4037 Menokin Rd, Warsaw, Virginia, 22572, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.menokin.org

Menokin is the 1769 home of Signer of the Declaration of Independence, Francis Lightfoot Lee and Rebecca Tayloe Lee. This former manor house remains one of Virginia’s best examples of original colonial architecture. Built near the Rappahannock River, the ruin is nestled among 500 nearly-untouched acres of historical landscape, 325 of which are part of the Rappahannock River Valley National Wildlife Refuge. OUR MISSION is to use the historic ruin and the surrounding built and natural environments to transcend the traditional house museum experience. We use contemporary methods to create opportunities for the public to contemplate and explore the building of America. Our approach reimagines how individuals connect to history and promotes provocative dialogue around our nation’s founding ideals and realities. The Menokin Foundation is a 501(c)3 nonprofit that is supported wholly by philanthropic contributions from individuals, foundations, and corporations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Museums at Washington and Lee

204 N. Washington Street, None, Lexington, Virginia, US, 24450
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
museums.wlu.edu

The Museums at W&L's mission is to advance learning through direct engagement with the collections and to facilitate an interdisciplinary appreciation of art, history, and culture. It encompasses two distinct entities: the Art Museum and Galleries, and the forthcoming Institutional History Museum. The Art Museum and Galleries consist of three sites: the Reeves Museum of Ceramics, Watson Galleries, and McCarthy Gallery. The Institutional History Museum currently consists of two sites: Washington Galleries and the University Chapel and Chapel Galleries.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/menokin-foundation.jpeg
Menokin Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wlumuseums.jpeg
Museums at Washington and Lee
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Menokin Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museums at Washington and Lee
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Menokin Foundation in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museums at Washington and Lee in 2026.

Incident History — Menokin Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Menokin Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museums at Washington and Lee (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museums at Washington and Lee cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/menokin-foundation.jpeg
Menokin Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wlumuseums.jpeg
Museums at Washington and Lee
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Menokin Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museums at Washington and Lee company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Museums at Washington and Lee company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Menokin Foundation company.

In the current year, Museums at Washington and Lee company and Menokin Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museums at Washington and Lee company nor Menokin Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museums at Washington and Lee company nor Menokin Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museums at Washington and Lee company nor Menokin Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Menokin Foundation company nor Museums at Washington and Lee company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Menokin Foundation nor Museums at Washington and Lee holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Menokin Foundation company nor Museums at Washington and Lee company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museums at Washington and Lee company employs more people globally than Menokin Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Menokin Foundation nor Museums at Washington and Lee holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Menokin Foundation nor Museums at Washington and Lee holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Menokin Foundation nor Museums at Washington and Lee holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Menokin Foundation nor Museums at Washington and Lee holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Menokin Foundation nor Museums at Washington and Lee holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Menokin Foundation nor Museums at Washington and Lee holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References