Comparison Overview

Memorial Hermann Health System

VS

Michigan Medicine

Memorial Hermann Health System

None, None, Houston, Texas, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.memorialhermann.org/

Advancing Health. Personalizing Care. Memorial Hermann Health System is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. A fully integrated health system with more than 260 care delivery sites throughout the Greater Houston area, Memorial Hermann is committed to delivering safe, high-quality, patient-centered care and offers clinical expertise, innovation and cutting-edge technology to all patients.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 18,811
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Michigan Medicine

1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, US, 48109
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749
http://www.uofmhealth.org

Michigan Medicine, based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, is part of one of the world’s leading universities. Michigan Medicine is a premier, highly ranked academic medical center and award-winning health care system with state-of-the-art facilities. Our vision is to create the future of health care through scientific discovery, innovations in education, and the most effective and compassionate care. We want to be the leader in health care, health care reform, and biomedical innovation. Michigan Medicine includes the U-M Hospitals and Health Centers; the U-M Medical School and its Faculty Group Practice; one of the nation's largest biomedical research communities; and education programs that train thousands of future health professionals and scientists each year. We were formerly known as the University of Michigan Medical Center; today that term applies generally to the collection of buildings on our main medical campus in Ann Arbor. We have a close partnership with the U-M School of Nursing and other health sciences schools at U-M. Through the Michigan Health Corporation, we are able to form partnerships outside of our University.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 14,206
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/memorialhermann.jpeg
Memorial Hermann Health System
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/michigan-medicine.jpeg
Michigan Medicine
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Memorial Hermann Health System
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Michigan Medicine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Memorial Hermann Health System in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Michigan Medicine in 2025.

Incident History — Memorial Hermann Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Memorial Hermann Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Michigan Medicine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Michigan Medicine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/memorialhermann.jpeg
Memorial Hermann Health System
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/michigan-medicine.jpeg
Michigan Medicine
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Third-party vendor compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Email Account
Motivation: Curiosity
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Memorial Hermann Health System company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Michigan Medicine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Michigan Medicine company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Memorial Hermann Health System company.

In the current year, Michigan Medicine company and Memorial Hermann Health System company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Michigan Medicine company nor Memorial Hermann Health System company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Michigan Medicine company and Memorial Hermann Health System company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Michigan Medicine company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Memorial Hermann Health System company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Memorial Hermann Health System company nor Michigan Medicine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Memorial Hermann Health System nor Michigan Medicine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Michigan Medicine company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Memorial Hermann Health System company.

Memorial Hermann Health System company employs more people globally than Michigan Medicine company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Memorial Hermann Health System nor Michigan Medicine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Memorial Hermann Health System nor Michigan Medicine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Memorial Hermann Health System nor Michigan Medicine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Memorial Hermann Health System nor Michigan Medicine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Memorial Hermann Health System nor Michigan Medicine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Memorial Hermann Health System nor Michigan Medicine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References