Comparison Overview

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

VS

Rush University Medical Center

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, US, 10065
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The people of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) are united by a singular mission: ending cancer for life. Our specialized care teams provide personalized, compassionate, expert care to patients of all ages. Informed by basic research done at our Sloan Kettering Institute, scientists across MSK collaborate to conduct innovative translational and clinical research that is driving a revolution in our understanding of cancer as a disease and improving the ability to prevent, diagnose, and treat it. MSK is dedicated to training the next generation of scientists and clinicians, who go on to pursue our mission at MSK and around the globe. One of the world’s most respected comprehensive centers devoted exclusively to cancer, we have been recognized as one of the top two cancer hospitals in the country by U.S. News & World Report for more than 30 years.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 19,458
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rush University Medical Center

1620 W Harrison St, Chicago, 60612, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Rush University Medical Center is an academic medical center that includes a 671-bed hospital serving adults and children, the 61-bed Johnston R. Bowman Health Center and Rush University. Rush University is home to one of the first medical colleges in the Midwest and one of the nation's top-ranked nursing colleges, as well as graduate programs in allied health, health systems management and biomedical research. The medical center also offers more than 70 highly selective residency and fellowship programs in medical and surgical specialties and subspecialties. For more than 170 years, Rush has been leading the way in developing innovative and often life-saving treatments. Today, Rush is a thriving center for basic and clinical research, with physicians and scientists involved in hundreds of research projects developing and testing the effectiveness and safety of new therapies and medical devices. In addition to its mission in patient care, education and research, Rush maintains a strong commitment to the community. Rush reaches out to the Chicago community through such offerings as the Rush Community Services Initiatives Program, an umbrella for several student-led outreach programs designed to address the social and health care needs of residents in neighboring communities.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 12,083
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/memorial-sloan-kettering-cancer-center.jpeg
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rush-university-medical-center.jpeg
Rush University Medical Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rush University Medical Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rush University Medical Center in 2025.

Incident History — Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rush University Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rush University Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/memorial-sloan-kettering-cancer-center.jpeg
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rush-university-medical-center.jpeg
Rush University Medical Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access/Disclosure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rush University Medical Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Rush University Medical Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, Rush University Medical Center company and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rush University Medical Center company nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rush University Medical Center company nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rush University Medical Center company nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company nor Rush University Medical Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nor Rush University Medical Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rush University Medical Center company.

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company employs more people globally than Rush University Medical Center company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nor Rush University Medical Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nor Rush University Medical Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nor Rush University Medical Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nor Rush University Medical Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nor Rush University Medical Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nor Rush University Medical Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N