Comparison Overview

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

VS

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, US, 10065
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mskcc.org

The people of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) are united by a singular mission: ending cancer for life. Our specialized care teams provide personalized, compassionate, expert care to patients of all ages. Informed by basic research done at our Sloan Kettering Institute, scientists across MSK collaborate to conduct innovative translational and clinical research that is driving a revolution in our understanding of cancer as a disease and improving the ability to prevent, diagnose, and treat it. MSK is dedicated to training the next generation of scientists and clinicians, who go on to pursue our mission at MSK and around the globe. One of the world’s most respected comprehensive centers devoted exclusively to cancer, we have been recognized as one of the top two cancer hospitals in the country by U.S. News & World Report for more than 30 years.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 19,458
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP

55, Boulevard Diderot, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75012
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aphp.fr

AP-HP (Greater Paris University Hospitals) is a European world-renowned university hospital. Its 39 hospitals treat 8 million people every year: in consultation, emergency, during scheduled or home hospitalizations. The AP-HP provides a public health service for everyone, 24 hours a day. This mission is a duty as well as a great source of pride. AP-HP is the leading employer in the Greater Paris area: 100.000 staff members – doctors, researchers, paramedical staff, administrative personnel and workers – work there.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 20,296
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/memorial-sloan-kettering-cancer-center.jpeg
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ap-hp.jpeg
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP in 2025.

Incident History — Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/memorial-sloan-kettering-cancer-center.jpeg
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ap-hp.jpeg
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company.

In the current year, Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company.

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company employs more people globally than Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nor Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References