Comparison Overview

Melbourne Spoken Word

VS

Pablo Center at the Confluence

Melbourne Spoken Word

PO Box 3, Brunswick West, 3055, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Melbourne Spoken Word is an emerging arts organisation created to promote and develop spoken word and poetry in Melbourne and wider Victoria. Founded in 2012, it supports a wide network of spoken word events, tours international poets and hosts spoken word events itself, promote poetry through video, interviews and reviews, as well as hosts workshops, and hosted the inaugural Melbourne Spoken Word & Poetry Festival in 2018. MSW is currently an unincorporated association run by Director Benjamin Solah and a committee of local poets. MSW aims to become incorporated in the next year or so, with a board created to serve a not-for-profit organisation.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pablo Center at the Confluence

128 Graham Ave, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, 54701, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Pablo Center at the Confluence is located in downtown Eau Claire, Wisconsin and will include a 1,200‐seat theatre and a flexible 400-seat theatre, rehearsal, dance and community rooms; visual arts studio and galleries, labs for sound and lighting, set and exhibit design, recording arts, multimedia production and costume design; a scene shop equipped to support the maker space and vocational training initiatives; administrative offices for management, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire faculty and Visit Eau Claire staff. The Pablo Center at the Confluence offers the community a facility capable of providing transformative training, learning and creative opportunities. Pablo Center at the Confluence will operate in support of a mission that is focused on augmenting and developing regional education opportunities in the performing, visual and literary arts for people of all ages and backgrounds.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/melbspokenword.jpeg
Melbourne Spoken Word
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pablo-center-at-the-confluence.jpeg
Pablo Center at the Confluence
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Melbourne Spoken Word
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pablo Center at the Confluence
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Melbourne Spoken Word in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pablo Center at the Confluence in 2025.

Incident History — Melbourne Spoken Word (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Melbourne Spoken Word cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pablo Center at the Confluence (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pablo Center at the Confluence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/melbspokenword.jpeg
Melbourne Spoken Word
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pablo-center-at-the-confluence.jpeg
Pablo Center at the Confluence
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Melbourne Spoken Word company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pablo Center at the Confluence company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pablo Center at the Confluence company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Melbourne Spoken Word company.

In the current year, Pablo Center at the Confluence company and Melbourne Spoken Word company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pablo Center at the Confluence company nor Melbourne Spoken Word company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pablo Center at the Confluence company nor Melbourne Spoken Word company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pablo Center at the Confluence company nor Melbourne Spoken Word company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Melbourne Spoken Word company nor Pablo Center at the Confluence company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Melbourne Spoken Word nor Pablo Center at the Confluence holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Melbourne Spoken Word company nor Pablo Center at the Confluence company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Melbourne Spoken Word nor Pablo Center at the Confluence holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Melbourne Spoken Word nor Pablo Center at the Confluence holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Melbourne Spoken Word nor Pablo Center at the Confluence holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Melbourne Spoken Word nor Pablo Center at the Confluence holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Melbourne Spoken Word nor Pablo Center at the Confluence holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Melbourne Spoken Word nor Pablo Center at the Confluence holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N