Comparison Overview

Melbourne Recital Centre

VS

Lyric Opera of Chicago

Melbourne Recital Centre

Cnr Southbank Blvd & Sturt Street, Southbank, 3006, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17

A venue of, and for, the 21st Century. Comprising two of the finest acoustic spaces in the southern hemisphere, the 1000-seat Elisabeth Murdoch Hall and the flexible 150-seat Salon, Melbourne Recital Centre is a world-class facility for the performance of music. Opened in 2009, the Centre now hosts over 500 concerts and events per year, spanning classical, contemporary, pop, jazz, folk, opera, blues, world music and more. Melbourne Recital Centre's vision is to create an inspired global community of musicians and music-lovers and a world of music for all. Our values are Respect, Excellence, Creativity, Inclusiveness, Teamwork, Accountability and Loyalty. Visit the Centre in-person on the corner of Southbank Boulevard and Sturt Street, Southbank, call the Box Office on 03 9699 3333 during business hours and visit melbournerecital.com.au.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lyric Opera of Chicago

20 N Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL, 60606, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Lyric Opera of Chicago, founded in 1954, is one of the world's greatest opera companies. It is renowned internationally for its artistic excellence and financial strength. Over the past two decades the company has achieved unparalleled success in its ticket sales, averaging 100% attendance from 1988-2002. Lyric Opera is also distinguished for having operated in the black for 20 of the past 21 years.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 505
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/melbourne-recital-centre.jpeg
Melbourne Recital Centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyric-opera-of-chicago.jpeg
Lyric Opera of Chicago
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Melbourne Recital Centre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lyric Opera of Chicago
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Melbourne Recital Centre in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lyric Opera of Chicago in 2025.

Incident History — Melbourne Recital Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Melbourne Recital Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lyric Opera of Chicago (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lyric Opera of Chicago cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/melbourne-recital-centre.jpeg
Melbourne Recital Centre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyric-opera-of-chicago.jpeg
Lyric Opera of Chicago
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lyric Opera of Chicago company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Melbourne Recital Centre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lyric Opera of Chicago company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Melbourne Recital Centre company.

In the current year, Lyric Opera of Chicago company and Melbourne Recital Centre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago company nor Melbourne Recital Centre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago company nor Melbourne Recital Centre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago company nor Melbourne Recital Centre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Melbourne Recital Centre company nor Lyric Opera of Chicago company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Melbourne Recital Centre nor Lyric Opera of Chicago holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Melbourne Recital Centre company nor Lyric Opera of Chicago company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lyric Opera of Chicago company employs more people globally than Melbourne Recital Centre company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Melbourne Recital Centre nor Lyric Opera of Chicago holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Melbourne Recital Centre nor Lyric Opera of Chicago holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Melbourne Recital Centre nor Lyric Opera of Chicago holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Melbourne Recital Centre nor Lyric Opera of Chicago holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Melbourne Recital Centre nor Lyric Opera of Chicago holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Melbourne Recital Centre nor Lyric Opera of Chicago holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Framework prior to versions 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x display the full server stack trace when encountering an error within the GetCdfResource servlet.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Editor plugin versions before 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x, deserialize untrusted JSON data without constraining the parser to approved classes and methods.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The impacted element is an unknown function in the library /ctcms/libs/Ct_Config.php of the component Backend System Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument Cj_Add/Cj_Edit results in code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The affected element is the function Save of the file /ctcms/libs/Ct_App.php of the component Backend App Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument CT_App_Paytype leads to code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15, it was possible to accept an invitation opened by a different user. Version 5.15. contains a patch. As a workaround, avoid leaving one's Weblate sessions with an invitation opened unattended.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X