Comparison Overview

Meituan

VS

UKG

Meituan

Wangjing International R&D Park, No.6 Wangjing East Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, CN, 100102
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.meituan.com/en-US/about-us

Adhering to the ‘Retail + Technology’ strategy, Meituan commits to its mission that 'We help people eat better, live better'. Since its establishment in March 2010, Meituan has advanced the digital upgrading of services and goods retail on both supply and demand sides. Together with our partners we provide quality services for consumers. On 20 September, 2018, Meituan was listed on the Main Board of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong. Meituan has always put customers first, and continuously increased its R&D investment in new technologies. Meituan will join hands with all partners to fulfill our social responsibility and create more values for the society.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 40,304
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

UKG

None
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 700 and 749
http://ukg.com

UKG is the Workforce Operating Platform that puts workforce understanding to work. With the world's largest collection of workforce insights, and people-first AI, our ability to reveal unseen ways to build trust, amplify productivity, and empower talent, is unmatched. It's this expertise that equips our customers with the intelligence to solve any challenge in any industry — because great organizations know their workforce is their competitive edge.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 16,048
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meituan.jpeg
Meituan
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ukg.jpeg
UKG
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Meituan
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UKG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meituan in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UKG in 2026.

Incident History — Meituan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meituan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UKG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UKG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meituan.jpeg
Meituan
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2018
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ukg.jpeg
UKG
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Meituan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UKG company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UKG company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Meituan company.

In the current year, UKG company and Meituan company have not reported any cyber incidents.

UKG company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Meituan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

UKG company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Meituan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UKG company nor Meituan company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Meituan company nor UKG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Meituan nor UKG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Meituan company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UKG company.

Meituan company employs more people globally than UKG company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Meituan nor UKG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Meituan nor UKG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Meituan nor UKG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Meituan nor UKG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Meituan nor UKG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Meituan nor UKG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References