Comparison Overview

Q: Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Meituan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Google company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Q: Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Google company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Meituan company.

Q: Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

In the current year, Google company has reported more cyber incidents than Meituan company.

Q: Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Google company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Meituan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Q: Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Google company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Meituan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Q: Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Google company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Meituan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Q: Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Google company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Meituan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Q: Between Meituan company and Google company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Neither Meituan nor Google holds any compliance certifications.

Q: Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Google company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Meituan company.

Meituan

Wangjing International R&D Park, No.6 Wangjing East Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, CN, 100102

Last Update: 2026-01-17

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

https://www.meituan.com/en-US/about-us

Adhering to the ‘Retail + Technology’ strategy, Meituan commits to its mission that 'We help people eat better, live better'. Since its establishment in March 2010, Meituan has advanced the digital upgrading of services and goods retail on both supply and demand sides. Together with our partners we provide quality services for consumers. On 20 September, 2018, Meituan was listed on the Main Board of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong. Meituan has always put customers first, and continuously increased its R&D investment in new technologies. Meituan will join hands with all partners to fulfill our social responsibility and create more values for the society.

NAICS: 5112

NAICS Definition: Software Publishers

Employees: 40,304

Subsidiaries: 2

12-month incidents

0

Known data breaches

0

Attack type number

1

View Profile

Google

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, 94043, US

Last Update: 2026-01-21

Between 700 and 749

https://goo.gle/3DLEokh

A problem isn't truly solved until it's solved for all. Googlers build products that help create opportunities for everyone, whether down the street or across the globe. Bring your insight, imagination and a healthy disregard for the impossible. Bring everything that makes you unique. Together, we can build for everyone. Check out our career opportunities at goo.gle/3DLEokh

NAICS: 5112

NAICS Definition: Software Publishers

Employees: 327,709

Subsidiaries: 46

12-month incidents

3

Known data breaches

5

Attack type number

5

Meituan

—

ISO 27001

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 1

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 2

Not verified

—

GDPR

Not verified

—

PCI DSS

Not verified

—

HIPAA

Not verified

Google

—

ISO 27001

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 1

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 2

Not verified

—

GDPR

Not verified

—

PCI DSS

Not verified

—

HIPAA

Not verified

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meituan in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Google has 147.93% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Meituan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meituan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Google (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Google cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Meituan

Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2018

Type:Data Leak

Motivation: Financial

Blog: Blog

Google

Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026

Type:Vulnerability

Attack Vector: Malicious calendar invite with hidden prompt

Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2026

Type:Vulnerability

Attack Vector: Bluetooth (Fast Pair protocol)

Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2026

Type:Vulnerability

Attack Vector: Misconfigured Default Settings, Confused Deputy Attack

Blog: Blog

Meituan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Google company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Google company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Meituan company.

In the current year, Google company has reported more cyber incidents than Meituan company.

Google company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Meituan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Google company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Meituan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Google company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Meituan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Google company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Meituan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Meituan nor Google holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Google company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Meituan company.

Google company employs more people globally than Meituan company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Meituan nor Google holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Meituan nor Google holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Meituan nor Google holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Meituan nor Google holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Meituan nor Google holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Meituan nor Google holds GDPR certification.

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g., execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss4

Base: 7.7

Severity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

References

https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.2

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.1

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.2

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.2

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Comparison Overview

Meituan

VS

Google

Meituan

Google

Compliance Badges Comparison

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Incident History — Meituan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Incident History — Google (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Notable Incidents

FAQ

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-0933

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21990

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21989

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21988

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21987

Risk Information

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Comparison Overview

Meituan

VS

Google

Meituan

Google

Compliance Badges Comparison

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Incident History — Meituan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Incident History — Google (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Notable Incidents

🔒 Incident : Data Leak MEI231827722

🔒 Incident : Vulnerability GOO1768856368

🔒 Incident : Vulnerability GOO1768808982

🔒 Incident : Vulnerability GOO1768649952

FAQ

Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Meituan company and Google company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Meituan company and Google company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Meituan company and Google company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Meituan and Google, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Meituan and Google, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified — Meituan or Google ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant — Meituan or Google ?

Between Meituan and Google, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Meituan and Google, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-0933

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21990

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21989

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21988

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21987

Risk Information