Comparison Overview

Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc.

VS

LPA Law

Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc.

1555 River Park Dr # 108, Sacramento, California, 95815-4666, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. has been serving California since 1979 when it was known as The Law Offices of Johnson and Fort. The firm focuses on providing probate, estate planning, business and tax law help to people throughout California. The main office is in Sacramento a satellite office in Roseville.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LPA Law

136 avenue des Champs Elysées, Paris, FR, 75008
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

LPA Law est l'un des principaux cabinets d'affaires français indépendants, composé de plus de 270 avocats et professionnels du droit répartis dans 14 bureaux dans le monde (en Europe, Asie, Afrique et au Moyen-Orient), dont 35 associés à Paris. LPA Law assiste ses clients dans tous les domaines du droit des affaires, en conseil comme en contentieux. Cette capacité de mobilisation permet de faire bénéficier ses clients des compétences et expertises nécessaires pour anticiper et résoudre des situations complexes. LPA Law propose des spécialistes dans chaque domaine du droit et dans les principaux secteurs d'activités. LPA Law a placé au cœur de son projet de demeurer un cabinet français et indépendant. Conscient de la globalisation accrue des affaires, il a organisé son développement international et accompagne ses clients dans leur développement à travers l'ouverture de bureaux sur des marchés en plein essor.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 249
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meissner-joseph-&-palley-inc.jpeg
Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lpa-law.jpeg
LPA Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LPA Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LPA Law in 2025.

Incident History — Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LPA Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LPA Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meissner-joseph-&-palley-inc.jpeg
Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lpa-law.jpeg
LPA Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LPA Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LPA Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. company.

In the current year, LPA Law company and Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LPA Law company nor Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LPA Law company nor Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LPA Law company nor Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. company nor LPA Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. nor LPA Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. company nor LPA Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LPA Law company employs more people globally than Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. nor LPA Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. nor LPA Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. nor LPA Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. nor LPA Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. nor LPA Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Meissner Joseph Ruggles, Inc. nor LPA Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X