Comparison Overview

Meezan Bank Limited

VS

Bancolombia

Meezan Bank Limited

Meezan House, C-25, Estate Avenue, SITE, Karachi, Karachi, Sindh, 75500, PK
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Meezan Bank, Pakistan's first and largest Islamic bank, is one of the fastest growing financial institutions in the banking sector of the country. With its Vision of establishing ‘Islamic banking as banking of first choice’ – the Bank commenced operations in 2002, after being issued the first-ever Islamic commercial banking license by the State Bank of Pakistan. Meezan Bank has an impressive growth rate, excellent credit rating and a strong Shariah Advisory board including reputed scholars from around the world.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 11,966
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bancolombia

CARRERA 48 26 85 AV INDUSTRIALES, Medellín, Antioquia, CO
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Somos un grupo financiero latinoamericano que apoya los sueños de las personas y busca establecer con ellas relaciones duraderas, basadas en la confianza, la cercanía, el respeto, la inclusión y la calidez. Escuchar, pensar en el otro y ser sensible a sus necesidades, nos ha llevado hacia una manera diferente de relacionarnos en la que todos somos importantes, porque no es lo mismo prestar servicios financieros que apoyar la construcción de proyectos de vida. Continuamos avanzando en nuestro proceso de transformación. La meta es ser más para servir mejor a través de soluciones ágiles, simples e impecables. Para lograrlo, le estamos poniendo el alma.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 20,196
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meezan-bank-ltd.jpeg
Meezan Bank Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bancolombia.jpeg
Bancolombia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Meezan Bank Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bancolombia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meezan Bank Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bancolombia in 2025.

Incident History — Meezan Bank Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meezan Bank Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bancolombia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bancolombia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meezan-bank-ltd.jpeg
Meezan Bank Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bancolombia.jpeg
Bancolombia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bancolombia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Meezan Bank Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bancolombia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Meezan Bank Limited company.

In the current year, Bancolombia company and Meezan Bank Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bancolombia company nor Meezan Bank Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bancolombia company nor Meezan Bank Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bancolombia company nor Meezan Bank Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Meezan Bank Limited company nor Bancolombia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Meezan Bank Limited nor Bancolombia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bancolombia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Meezan Bank Limited company.

Bancolombia company employs more people globally than Meezan Bank Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Meezan Bank Limited nor Bancolombia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Meezan Bank Limited nor Bancolombia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Meezan Bank Limited nor Bancolombia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Meezan Bank Limited nor Bancolombia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Meezan Bank Limited nor Bancolombia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Meezan Bank Limited nor Bancolombia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N