Comparison Overview

MeetMindful

VS

Rover.com

MeetMindful

1062 Delaware St, None, Denver, CO, US, 80204
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.meetmindful.com

We believe mindfulness magically transforms everything, so we connect like-minded people in an online dating community that puts the pleasure back into partnering up. - Common ground is more than a shared zip code. Meet like-minded people who are here for deeper connections, too. - Get ready to talk about what lights you up! This genuine community of co-creators and adventurers comes to you 10 matches at a time. - A team of real people and our fancy algorithm help suss out fake profiles and keep your connections authentic. Available in for iOS and Android, or at meetmindful.com.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Rover.com

720 Olive Way, Seattle, Washington, US, 98101
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rover.com

At Rover, everyone has ownership of their work and the opportunity to make a true impact. We believe that being diverse and inclusive is key to our success and encourage every employee to share their unique perspective while being their true self. We believe everyone deserves the unconditional love of a pet, and Rover exists to make it easier to experience that love. We’re supporting dog owners and empowering dog sitters to run thriving pet-care businesses in your neighborhoods. The Rover app and website connect dog and cat parents with loving pet sitters and dog walkers in neighborhoods across the US, Canada, and Europe.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 10,830
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meetmindful.jpeg
MeetMindful
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roverdotcom.jpeg
Rover.com
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MeetMindful
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rover.com
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MeetMindful in 2025.

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rover.com in 2025.

Incident History — MeetMindful (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MeetMindful cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rover.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rover.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meetmindful.jpeg
MeetMindful
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roverdotcom.jpeg
Rover.com
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rover.com company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MeetMindful company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

MeetMindful company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Rover.com company has not reported any.

In the current year, Rover.com company and MeetMindful company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rover.com company nor MeetMindful company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rover.com company nor MeetMindful company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

MeetMindful company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Rover.com company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither MeetMindful company nor Rover.com company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MeetMindful nor Rover.com holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MeetMindful company nor Rover.com company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rover.com company employs more people globally than MeetMindful company, reflecting its scale as a Consumer Services.

Neither MeetMindful nor Rover.com holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MeetMindful nor Rover.com holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MeetMindful nor Rover.com holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MeetMindful nor Rover.com holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MeetMindful nor Rover.com holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MeetMindful nor Rover.com holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References