Comparison Overview

Meesho

VS

Swiggy

Meesho

WeWork, Vaishnavi Signature, 78/9, Outer Ring Road, Bellandur Village Varthur Hobli Bengaluru East Ground Floor, WeWork, Vaishnavi Signature, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560103
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Meesho is India’s fastest growing internet commerce company. We want to make eCommerce accessible to all. Our vision is to enable 100 million small businesses in India, including individual entrepreneurs, to succeed online. Our mission is to democratise internet commerce by bringing a range of products & new customers online. What started as a reseller-focused platform six years ago has now emerged as a single ecosystem connecting millions of sellers, consumers and entrepreneurs. Want to know more. Check us out on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Meesho_Official

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19,454
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Swiggy

undefined, Bengaluru, Karnataka, undefined, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Swiggy is India’s pioneering on-demand convenience platform, catering to millions of consumers each month. Founded in 2014, its mission is to elevate the quality of life for the urban consumer by offering unparalleled convenience. With an extensive footprint in food delivery, Swiggy Food collaborates with nearly 2 lakh restaurants across 600+ cities. Swiggy Instamart, its quick commerce platform operating in 43 cities, delivers groceries and other essentials across 20+ categories in 10 minutes. Fueled by a commitment to innovation, Swiggy continually incubates and integrates new services like Swiggy Dineout and Swiggy Genie into its multi-service app. Leveraging cutting-edge technology and Swiggy One, the country’s only membership program offering benefits across food, quick commerce, dining out, and pick-up and drop services, Swiggy aims to provide a superior experience to its consumers. For more information, visit www.swiggy.com

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 21,987
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meesho.jpeg
Meesho
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swiggy-in.jpeg
Swiggy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Meesho
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Swiggy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meesho in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swiggy in 2025.

Incident History — Meesho (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meesho cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Swiggy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swiggy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meesho.jpeg
Meesho
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swiggy-in.jpeg
Swiggy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Meesho company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Swiggy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Swiggy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Meesho company.

In the current year, Swiggy company and Meesho company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Swiggy company nor Meesho company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Swiggy company nor Meesho company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Swiggy company nor Meesho company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Meesho company nor Swiggy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Meesho nor Swiggy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Swiggy company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Meesho company.

Swiggy company employs more people globally than Meesho company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Meesho nor Swiggy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Meesho nor Swiggy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Meesho nor Swiggy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Meesho nor Swiggy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Meesho nor Swiggy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Meesho nor Swiggy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N