Comparison Overview

Meesho

VS

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

Meesho

WeWork, Vaishnavi Signature, 78/9, Outer Ring Road, Bellandur Village Varthur Hobli Bengaluru East Ground Floor, WeWork, Vaishnavi Signature, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560103
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

Meesho is India’s fastest growing internet commerce company. We want to make eCommerce accessible to all. Our vision is to enable 100 million small businesses in India, including individual entrepreneurs, to succeed online. Our mission is to democratise internet commerce by bringing a range of products & new customers online. What started as a reseller-focused platform six years ago has now emerged as a single ecosystem connecting millions of sellers, consumers and entrepreneurs. Want to know more. Check us out on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Meesho_Official

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19,454
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

IndiaMART InterMESH Ltd., 6th floor, Tower 2, Assotech Business Cresterra, Noida, UP, 201305, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

IndiaMART is India's largest online B2B marketplace, connecting buyers with suppliers across a wide array of industries. IndiaMART provides a platform for Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs), large enterprises, and individual buyers, helping them access diverse portfolios of quality products. Since 1999, IndiaMART’s mission has been to make doing business easy. Today, over 20.6 Crore buyers can explore and choose from 11.5 Crore products, sourced from 82 Lakh suppliers, creating a one-stop platform for all business needs. IndiaMART offers enhanced business visibility and credibility for suppliers, with tools designed to support business growth and operational efficiency. With a dedicated workforce of over 5000 employees across India, IndiaMART continues to facilitate seamless connections and provide a trusted marketplace for businesses to thrive.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17,538
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meesho.jpeg
Meesho
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indiamart-intermesh-limited.jpeg
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Meesho
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meesho in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IndiaMART InterMESH Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Meesho (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meesho cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IndiaMART InterMESH Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meesho.jpeg
Meesho
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indiamart-intermesh-limited.jpeg
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Meesho company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Meesho company.

In the current year, IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company and Meesho company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company nor Meesho company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company nor Meesho company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company nor Meesho company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Meesho company nor IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Meesho nor IndiaMART InterMESH Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Meesho company.

Meesho company employs more people globally than IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Meesho nor IndiaMART InterMESH Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Meesho nor IndiaMART InterMESH Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Meesho nor IndiaMART InterMESH Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Meesho nor IndiaMART InterMESH Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Meesho nor IndiaMART InterMESH Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Meesho nor IndiaMART InterMESH Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H