Comparison Overview

Meerahi VR

VS

Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families

Meerahi VR

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Your Raahi to mental well-being! At Meerahi, we leverage the power of virtual reality (VR) to deliver innovative therapy solutions across a wide range of mental health needs with a focus on corporate wellness programs, including: Anxiety | Addiction | Behavioral issues| Phobias | Rehabilitation | Soft skill development We create safe and simulated environments based on exposure therapy principles, empowering individuals to find their path to well-being. We aim to revolutionize the mental health industry by providing safer, faster and more affordable therapy✨

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families

Shah and Nahar Industrial Premises, L R Papan Marg, Off Dr. E Moses Road, Worli Naka, Mumbai, 400077, IN
Last Update:

Yellow is a well-being centre for families. Our multi-disciplinary team of psychologists, therapists, and child development specialists provide evaluation and therapy services in our clinic. We are a boutique clinic offering best-in-class individualized support along the prevention-intervention continuum for children, adolescents and adults. Our services include: psychoeducational evaluation, counselling/therapy, parent coaching, school consultation, social emotional classes, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, remedial/special education, and animal assisted therpay.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meerahi.jpeg
Meerahi VR
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yellow-centre-for-children-youth-and-families.jpeg
Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Meerahi VR
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meerahi VR in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families in 2026.

Incident History — Meerahi VR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meerahi VR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meerahi.jpeg
Meerahi VR
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yellow-centre-for-children-youth-and-families.jpeg
Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Meerahi VR company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Meerahi VR company.

In the current year, Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families company and Meerahi VR company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families company nor Meerahi VR company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families company nor Meerahi VR company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families company nor Meerahi VR company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Meerahi VR company nor Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Meerahi VR nor Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Meerahi VR company nor Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Meerahi VR company employs more people globally than Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Meerahi VR nor Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Meerahi VR nor Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Meerahi VR nor Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Meerahi VR nor Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Meerahi VR nor Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Meerahi VR nor Yellow - Centre for Children, Youth, and Families holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N