Comparison Overview

MEDIUS

VS

TPI Solutions Ink

MEDIUS

15850 Concord Circle, Morgan Hill, 95037, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

MEDIUS stands as an experienced leader in print industry and bring our customers'​ products to market efficiently. Since our inception over 40 years ago, MEDIUS has evolved from a print shop to become a well known provider of commercial printing services. We serve major companies globally and start ups locally. Founded in 1983, MEDIUS'​ humble beginnings in the print industry have evolved and continue to evolve into the future.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TPI Solutions Ink

45 Calvary Street, Waltham, MA, 02453, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

TPI Solutions Ink offers digital printing on the HP Indigo Press, on demand with variable data capabilities, traditional offset printing, large format printing and B&W copying. Graphic design and desktop publishing services are available in house and TPI offers free local delivery. TPI Solutions Ink is an award winning print solutions provider. Family owned and operated. Serving the Greater Boston area for over 48 years.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medius-corporation.jpeg
MEDIUS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpi-solutions-ink.jpeg
TPI Solutions Ink
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MEDIUS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TPI Solutions Ink
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MEDIUS in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TPI Solutions Ink in 2025.

Incident History — MEDIUS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MEDIUS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TPI Solutions Ink (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TPI Solutions Ink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medius-corporation.jpeg
MEDIUS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpi-solutions-ink.jpeg
TPI Solutions Ink
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TPI Solutions Ink company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MEDIUS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TPI Solutions Ink company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MEDIUS company.

In the current year, TPI Solutions Ink company and MEDIUS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TPI Solutions Ink company nor MEDIUS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TPI Solutions Ink company nor MEDIUS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TPI Solutions Ink company nor MEDIUS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MEDIUS company nor TPI Solutions Ink company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MEDIUS nor TPI Solutions Ink holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MEDIUS company nor TPI Solutions Ink company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MEDIUS company employs more people globally than TPI Solutions Ink company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither MEDIUS nor TPI Solutions Ink holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MEDIUS nor TPI Solutions Ink holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MEDIUS nor TPI Solutions Ink holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MEDIUS nor TPI Solutions Ink holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MEDIUS nor TPI Solutions Ink holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MEDIUS nor TPI Solutions Ink holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N