Comparison Overview

Meditab Software Inc.

VS

Amadeus

Meditab Software Inc.

8795 Folsom Blvd, Suite 205, Sacramento, California, US, 95826
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 700 and 749

Empowering our clients with cutting edge technology to meet future healthcare needs today. Meditab, a leading software solutions company, founded in 1998 has been continuously changing the landscape of healthcare delivery through forward-thinking, innovative collaborations, exceptional service, and best-in-class technology. Our mission is simple -- to create the most advanced, intuitive technology solutions that enable healthcare providers to practice better medicine. We are unyielding in our effort to develop superior products that remain relevant and diversify how healthcare is delivered beyond the office. At Meditab, we strive to maximize productivity and live to invent a new age of healthcare, where technology fuels better quality of care for patients. Request a demo: https://www.meditab.com/demo

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 612
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Amadeus

C/Salvador de Madariaga 1, Madrid, ES, 28027
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

We make the experience of travel better for everyone, everywhere by inspiring innovation, partnerships and responsibility to people, places and planet. Our technology powers the travel and tourism industry. We inspire more connected ways of thinking, centered around the traveler. Our platform connects the travel and hospitality ecosystem. We are making travel a force for social and environmental good. We are passionate about travel. With a unique perspective, at the heart of our industry, we are redesigning the travel of tomorrow.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 22,756
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meditab-software-inc-.jpeg
Meditab Software Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amadeus.jpeg
Amadeus
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Meditab Software Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amadeus
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meditab Software Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Amadeus has 36.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Meditab Software Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meditab Software Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amadeus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amadeus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meditab-software-inc-.jpeg
Meditab Software Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Fax Server Vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amadeus.jpeg
Amadeus
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Amadeus company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Meditab Software Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Meditab Software Inc. and Amadeus have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Amadeus company has reported more cyber incidents than Meditab Software Inc. company.

Neither Amadeus company nor Meditab Software Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Meditab Software Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Amadeus company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Amadeus company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Meditab Software Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Meditab Software Inc. company nor Amadeus company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Meditab Software Inc. nor Amadeus holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Amadeus company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Meditab Software Inc. company.

Amadeus company employs more people globally than Meditab Software Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Meditab Software Inc. nor Amadeus holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Meditab Software Inc. nor Amadeus holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Meditab Software Inc. nor Amadeus holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Meditab Software Inc. nor Amadeus holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Meditab Software Inc. nor Amadeus holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Meditab Software Inc. nor Amadeus holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L