Comparison Overview

Medical University of South Carolina

VS

UnitedHealthcare

Medical University of South Carolina

45 Courtenay Drive,, MSC 203, Charleston, sc, US, 29425
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.musc.edu

The Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) is a public institution of higher learning the purpose of which is to preserve and optimize human life in South Carolina and beyond. The university provides an interprofessional environment for learning and discovery through education of health care professionals and biomedical scientists, research in the health sciences and provision of comprehensive health care.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 15,335
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

UnitedHealthcare

9700 Healthcare Lane, Minnetonka, 55343, US
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 650 and 699
http://www.uhc.com/

When it comes to your health, everything matters. That’s why UnitedHealthcare is helping people live healthier lives and making the health system work better for everyone. Our health plans are there for you in moments big and small, delivering a simple experience, affordable coverage, and supportive care. At UnitedHealthcare, part of the UnitedHealth Group family of businesses, we are working to create a system that is connected, aligned and more affordable for all involved; one that delivers high quality care, responsive to the needs of each person and the communities in which they live. With connections to more than 1.3 million physicians and care professionals and 6,500 hospitals and care facilities across the globe, we can collaborate in new ways to improve patient care while providing customizable and comprehensive solutions in any marketplace, anywhere. Our Values Integrity: Honor commitments. Never compromise ethics. Compassion: Walk in the shoes of the people we serve and those with whom we work. Relationships: Build trust through collaboration. Innovation: Invent the future. Learn from the past. Performance: Demonstrate excellence in everything we do. For more information about UnitedHealthcare, click here: https://www.uhc.com/ For information about careers at UnitedHealthcare, click here: https://www.workatuhc.com

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 16,035
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
8
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medical-university-of-south-carolina.jpeg
Medical University of South Carolina
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unitedhealthcare.jpeg
UnitedHealthcare
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Medical University of South Carolina
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UnitedHealthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Medical University of South Carolina in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UnitedHealthcare in 2026.

Incident History — Medical University of South Carolina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Medical University of South Carolina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UnitedHealthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UnitedHealthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medical-university-of-south-carolina.jpeg
Medical University of South Carolina
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unitedhealthcare.jpeg
UnitedHealthcare
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Physical Violence
Motivation: Protest against healthcare insurance claim denials, Criticism of healthcare companies' focus on profits over patient care
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Medical University of South Carolina company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UnitedHealthcare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UnitedHealthcare company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Medical University of South Carolina company has not reported any.

In the current year, UnitedHealthcare company and Medical University of South Carolina company have not reported any cyber incidents.

UnitedHealthcare company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Medical University of South Carolina company has not reported such incidents publicly.

UnitedHealthcare company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Medical University of South Carolina company has not reported such incidents publicly.

UnitedHealthcare company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Medical University of South Carolina company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina company nor UnitedHealthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina nor UnitedHealthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UnitedHealthcare company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Medical University of South Carolina company.

UnitedHealthcare company employs more people globally than Medical University of South Carolina company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina nor UnitedHealthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina nor UnitedHealthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina nor UnitedHealthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina nor UnitedHealthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina nor UnitedHealthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina nor UnitedHealthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References