Comparison Overview

Medical Library Association

VS

Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1

Medical Library Association

65 E. Wacker Place, Chicago, IL, 60601, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1898, the Medical Library Association is a nonprofit, educational organization of more than 1,100 institutions and 3,600 individual members in the health sciences information field, committed to educating health information professionals, supporting health information research, promoting access to the world's health sciences information, and working to ensure that the best health information is available to all. MLA member benefits include discounted registration to the MLA annual meeting, publications, continuing education opportunities, and much more. To join MLA, visit http://www.mlanet.org/joinmla/.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 67
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1

620 W Lombard St, Baltimore, 21201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Health Sciences and Human Services Library at the University of Maryland, Baltimore serves as the Regional Medical Library (RML) for Region 1, which provides programs, services, and dedicated support for NNLM Members in Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medical-library-association.jpeg
Medical Library Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/network-of-the-national-library-of-medicine-nnlm-region-1.jpeg
Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Medical Library Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Medical Library Association in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 in 2025.

Incident History — Medical Library Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Medical Library Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medical-library-association.jpeg
Medical Library Association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/network-of-the-national-library-of-medicine-nnlm-region-1.jpeg
Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Medical Library Association company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Medical Library Association company.

In the current year, Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 company and Medical Library Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 company nor Medical Library Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 company nor Medical Library Association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 company nor Medical Library Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Medical Library Association company nor Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Medical Library Association nor Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Medical Library Association company nor Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Medical Library Association company employs more people globally than Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Medical Library Association nor Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Medical Library Association nor Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Medical Library Association nor Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Medical Library Association nor Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Medical Library Association nor Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Medical Library Association nor Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) Region 1 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H