Comparison Overview

Media Defence

VS

Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers

Media Defence

330 High Holborn, London, England, GB, WC1V 7QT
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Media Defence is an international human rights organisation which provides legal defence to journalists, citizen journalists and independent media around the world who are under threat for their reporting. We work globally, where there is the greatest need. We defend journalists, citizen journalists and media outlets from legal threats that violate the right to freedom of expression so that they can continue to report on issues of public interest. By informing the public and holding power to account, a free press plays an essential role in society. Unfortunately, many journalists come under threat due to their reporting. This is why we provide legal support to ensure they can continue to report on issues of public interest. We are unique in what we do. To date, we are the only organisation in the world solely focused on providing this critical help to journalists.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers

101 Plaza Real, Boca Raton, 33432, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Our securities lawyers have represented more than 300 market participants in going public, corporate finance and securities law matters. Our clients are private companies and public companies listed and publicly traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market, the NYSE MKT and OTC Markets (OTC Pink, OTCQB and OTCQX). For two decades the Firm has served private and public companies and other market participants in corporate law matters, securities law and going public matters. The blogs subject areas include, but are not limited to, forensic law and investigations, SEC investigations and SEC defense, corporate law matters, compliance with the Securities Act of 1933 securities offer and sale and registration statement requirements, including Regulation A / Regulation A+ , private placement offerings under Regulation D including Rule 504 and Rule 506 and Regulation S and PIPE Transactions as well as registration statements on Forms S-1, Form F-1, Form S-8 and Form S-4; compliance with the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including Form 8-A and Form 10 registration statements, reporting on Forms 10-Q, Form 10-K and Form 8-K, Form 6-K and SEC Schedule 14C Information and SEC Schedule 14A Proxy Statements; Regulation A / Regulation A+ offerings; all forms of going public transactions; mergers and acquisitions; applications to and compliance with the corporate governance requirements of national securities exchanges including NASDAQ and NYSE MKT and foreign listings; crowdfunding; corporate; and general contract and business transactions. The firm provides preparation of corporate documents and other transaction documents such as share purchase and exchange agreements, stock purchase agreements, asset purchase agreements and reorganization agreements.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mediadefence.jpeg
Media Defence
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regulation-a-attorneys.jpeg
Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Media Defence
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Media Defence in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — Media Defence (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Media Defence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mediadefence.jpeg
Media Defence
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regulation-a-attorneys.jpeg
Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Media Defence company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Media Defence company.

In the current year, Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers company and Media Defence company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers company nor Media Defence company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers company nor Media Defence company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers company nor Media Defence company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Media Defence company nor Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Media Defence nor Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Media Defence company.

Neither Media Defence nor Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Media Defence nor Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Media Defence nor Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Media Defence nor Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Media Defence nor Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Media Defence nor Regulation A+ Attorneys - Going Public Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X