Comparison Overview

Media on Mars

VS

Redhaus Design

Media on Mars

77 Stirling Highway, North Fremantle, WA, 6159, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Media on Mars is a creative agency with a warm digital heart. People love the distinctive ways we communicate. For organisations, big and small, we craft communication programs, websites, and develop the brands within them. We believe we need to listen first and then the rest will be simple. We believe in the importance of touching people with our ideas. We’re passionate about creative design projects that support community development and environmental awareness. Our client base consists primarily of government and not-for-profit groups working in these areas. We’re committed to creating innovative, professional and engaging designs and we choose to engage with these organisations because we value their work.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Redhaus Design

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

We give life to ideas. And, like you, we are constantly striving to distinguish ourselves from our competition. Other companies will attempt to woo you with some of their advertising gimmicks or spout a list of their services that range from business cards to billboards, but we will not. Simply put... We offer the resources that you need to set you apart from the rest.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/media-on-mars.jpeg
Media on Mars
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redhaus-design.jpeg
Redhaus Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Media on Mars
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Redhaus Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Media on Mars in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Redhaus Design in 2025.

Incident History — Media on Mars (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Media on Mars cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Redhaus Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Redhaus Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/media-on-mars.jpeg
Media on Mars
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redhaus-design.jpeg
Redhaus Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Redhaus Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Media on Mars company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Redhaus Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Media on Mars company.

In the current year, Redhaus Design company and Media on Mars company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Redhaus Design company nor Media on Mars company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Redhaus Design company nor Media on Mars company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Redhaus Design company nor Media on Mars company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Media on Mars company nor Redhaus Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Media on Mars nor Redhaus Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Media on Mars company nor Redhaus Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Media on Mars company employs more people globally than Redhaus Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Media on Mars nor Redhaus Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Media on Mars nor Redhaus Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Media on Mars nor Redhaus Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Media on Mars nor Redhaus Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Media on Mars nor Redhaus Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Media on Mars nor Redhaus Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X