Comparison Overview

Medecs Learning

VS

CorrectCare Integrated Health

Medecs Learning

Innovation Dr, Dowsing Point, 7010, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Medecs Learning is a provider of clinical healthcare services and training for management, staff and stekeholders in the Healthcare and social assistance sector. Including Disability, Aged care & Community. With over 8000 students each year attending our courses. We understand the importance of safe & quality support and care for vulnerable people in our community that depends on quality clinical healthcare governance and education & training. Our highly experienced team of sector-led clinical instructors deliver nationally endorsed courses through our RTO ( no. 45695) as well as short courses both online and classroom based to develop your professional skills. Medecs Learning is an NDIS registered provider 0114 Community Nursing Care and is the leading provider of complex care education & training.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CorrectCare Integrated Health

1218 SOUTH BROADWAY, STE 250, Lexington, KY, US, 40504
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 550 and 599

The mission of CorrectCare - Integrated Health is to facilitate access to appropriate medical providers and to manage the claims payment process while minimizing costs within the correctional environment. For over a decade, CorrectCare - Integrated Health has provided utilization management, network access, and claims processing services solely within the correctional environment. Our company has experience with providing utilization management and claims management for small local facilities and entire state department of corrections. CCIH works hand-in-hand with state correctional personnel to provide necessary data for reducing their medical costs while increasing their quality of inmate care.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medecs-learning.jpeg
Medecs Learning
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/correctcare-integrated-health.jpeg
CorrectCare Integrated Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Medecs Learning
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CorrectCare Integrated Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Medecs Learning in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CorrectCare Integrated Health in 2025.

Incident History — Medecs Learning (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Medecs Learning cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CorrectCare Integrated Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CorrectCare Integrated Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medecs-learning.jpeg
Medecs Learning
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/correctcare-integrated-health.jpeg
CorrectCare Integrated Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2022
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Web Server
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Web Server Misconfiguration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Web Server Misconfiguration
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Medecs Learning company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CorrectCare Integrated Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

CorrectCare Integrated Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Medecs Learning company has not reported any.

In the current year, CorrectCare Integrated Health company and Medecs Learning company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CorrectCare Integrated Health company nor Medecs Learning company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

CorrectCare Integrated Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Medecs Learning company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CorrectCare Integrated Health company nor Medecs Learning company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

CorrectCare Integrated Health company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Medecs Learning company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Medecs Learning nor CorrectCare Integrated Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Medecs Learning company nor CorrectCare Integrated Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CorrectCare Integrated Health company employs more people globally than Medecs Learning company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Medecs Learning nor CorrectCare Integrated Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Medecs Learning nor CorrectCare Integrated Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Medecs Learning nor CorrectCare Integrated Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Medecs Learning nor CorrectCare Integrated Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Medecs Learning nor CorrectCare Integrated Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Medecs Learning nor CorrectCare Integrated Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H