Comparison Overview

MGG Health

VS

Aneurin Bevan University Health Board

MGG Health

33 Soho Square, London, England, W1D 3QU, GB
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

At MGG Health, we help to make life-changing care happen. We support a wide range of global organisations to deliver more health and care services, driving better patient outcomes and strengthening the resilience of health systems all around the world. Our group of healthcare brands operate 24-7 across 15 global locations, safeguarding the delivery of over 10 million hours of care every year. Services include healthcare recruitment, managed staffing services, clinical insourcing and health assessments.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 85
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Aneurin Bevan University Health Board

Gwent, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

Aneurin Bevan University Health Board was established on the 1st October 2009 and covers the areas of Blaenau Gwent, Caerphilly, Monmouthshire, Newport, Torfaen and South Powys. The Health Board employs over 14,000 staff, two thirds of whom are involved in direct patient care. There are more than 250 consultants in a total of over 1000 hospital and general practice doctors, 6,000 nurses, midwives, allied professionals and community workers. To view current vacancies, please visit Aneurin Bevan University Health Board Jobs: https://www.abuhb-jobs.co.uk/vacancies/current-vacancies/

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medacs-global-group.jpeg
MGG Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aneurin-bevan-university-health-board.jpeg
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MGG Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MGG Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aneurin Bevan University Health Board in 2025.

Incident History — MGG Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MGG Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aneurin Bevan University Health Board (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aneurin Bevan University Health Board cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medacs-global-group.jpeg
MGG Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aneurin-bevan-university-health-board.jpeg
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aneurin Bevan University Health Board company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MGG Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MGG Health company.

In the current year, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board company and MGG Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aneurin Bevan University Health Board company nor MGG Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aneurin Bevan University Health Board company nor MGG Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aneurin Bevan University Health Board company nor MGG Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MGG Health company nor Aneurin Bevan University Health Board company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MGG Health nor Aneurin Bevan University Health Board holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MGG Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Aneurin Bevan University Health Board company.

MGG Health company employs more people globally than Aneurin Bevan University Health Board company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither MGG Health nor Aneurin Bevan University Health Board holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MGG Health nor Aneurin Bevan University Health Board holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MGG Health nor Aneurin Bevan University Health Board holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MGG Health nor Aneurin Bevan University Health Board holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MGG Health nor Aneurin Bevan University Health Board holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MGG Health nor Aneurin Bevan University Health Board holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The Bold Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘percentage’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The ComboServlet in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.2, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.5, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not limit the number or size of the files it will combine, which allows remote attackers to create very large responses that lead to a denial of service attack via the URL query string.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and create arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary files on the target machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X