Comparison Overview

Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc.

VS

Carolina Chillers, LLC

Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc.

11301 Strang Line Rd, Lenexa, Kansas, 66215, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Delivering expertise and solutions! Our history built on service and a commitment to excellence began in 2012. We strive to be the Manufacturers’ Representative of choice for world-class HVAC equipment and systems expertise. Our mission is to empower contractors, engineers, and building owners with timely manufacturers’ information and unparalleled systems application knowledge. By doing so, we enable the successful design, procurement, installation, and maintenance of buildings that prioritize comfort, efficiency, safety, and ease of operation.

NAICS: 3334
NAICS Definition: Ventilation, Heating, Air-Conditioning, and Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Carolina Chillers, LLC

3810 Ladson Rd, Ladson, South Carolina, 29456, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Carolina Chillers, LLC specializes in HVAC service, installation, maintenance agreements, parts, equipment and equipment relocation, as well as complete system evaluations to determine building and facility efficiency. We are a licensed, full service mechanical contractor for all types of mechanical equipment including: air handlers, cooling towers, motors, pumps, valves, controls, variable frequency drives, data room HVAC, and chillers. Our customer base consists of commercial, medical, and industrial facilities and applications. Our solutions based philosophy and technical expertise are the foundations of our success and drive us in our pursuit of meeting our customers needs.

NAICS: 333
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mechsalesmidwest.jpeg
Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carolina-chillers-inc..jpeg
Carolina Chillers, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Carolina Chillers, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carolina Chillers, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Carolina Chillers, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carolina Chillers, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mechsalesmidwest.jpeg
Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carolina-chillers-inc..jpeg
Carolina Chillers, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Carolina Chillers, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Carolina Chillers, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. company.

In the current year, Carolina Chillers, LLC company and Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Carolina Chillers, LLC company nor Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Carolina Chillers, LLC company nor Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Carolina Chillers, LLC company nor Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. company nor Carolina Chillers, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. nor Carolina Chillers, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. company nor Carolina Chillers, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Carolina Chillers, LLC company employs more people globally than Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. nor Carolina Chillers, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. nor Carolina Chillers, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. nor Carolina Chillers, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. nor Carolina Chillers, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. nor Carolina Chillers, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mechanical Sales Midwest, Inc. nor Carolina Chillers, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H