Comparison Overview

Mechanical Engineering Forum

VS

Service First Agencies

Mechanical Engineering Forum

undefined, jaipur, Rajasthan, 302020, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mechanical-engg.com

knowledge network of mechanical engineering profession his mechanical engineering portal is the dream of ours to contribute for mechanical engineers and engineering and provide the free platform for young and experience engineers to show their passion in the field of engineering. Some of the things we look at . • To provide the Knowledge hub in form of this portal, for all mechanical engineers across the globe. • To create the bridge between the working engineers and academicians for the development of engineering course and the industry ready new engineers. • To provide the platform say in form of blogging so that they can publish their engineering thoughts and papers and can get feedback with almost null cost. • The working engineers can keep themselves upgraded with the latest happenings and keep their engineering basics sound and healthy by participation. • Young engineers can talk with the senior engineers to get some solutions for the problem they facing

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Service First Agencies

Cape Town, 7800, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.trane.com

Service First Agencies (Pty) Ltd is the authorised Trane Applied distributor for the coastal region in Southern Africa from Namibia to Swaziland and was established in 1986. Service First Cape (Cape Town) and Service First cc (Durban) are the only authorised service agents for Trane Applied Air Conditioning in the coastal region.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mechanical-engineering-forum.jpeg
Mechanical Engineering Forum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/service-first-agencies.jpeg
Service First Agencies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mechanical Engineering Forum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Service First Agencies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mechanical Engineering Forum in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Service First Agencies in 2025.

Incident History — Mechanical Engineering Forum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mechanical Engineering Forum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Service First Agencies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Service First Agencies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mechanical-engineering-forum.jpeg
Mechanical Engineering Forum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/service-first-agencies.jpeg
Service First Agencies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Service First Agencies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mechanical Engineering Forum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Service First Agencies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mechanical Engineering Forum company.

In the current year, Service First Agencies company and Mechanical Engineering Forum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Service First Agencies company nor Mechanical Engineering Forum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Service First Agencies company nor Mechanical Engineering Forum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Service First Agencies company nor Mechanical Engineering Forum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mechanical Engineering Forum company nor Service First Agencies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mechanical Engineering Forum nor Service First Agencies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mechanical Engineering Forum company nor Service First Agencies company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mechanical Engineering Forum company employs more people globally than Service First Agencies company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Mechanical Engineering Forum nor Service First Agencies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mechanical Engineering Forum nor Service First Agencies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mechanical Engineering Forum nor Service First Agencies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mechanical Engineering Forum nor Service First Agencies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mechanical Engineering Forum nor Service First Agencies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mechanical Engineering Forum nor Service First Agencies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References