Comparison Overview

MEBU Design & Marketing

VS

Nielsen Design Group

MEBU Design & Marketing

1 Rabbit run, Wilmington, DE, 19809, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mebumarketing.com

At MEBU we believe that your brand identity is your business path to success. By building a strong trusted identity with images your customers understand, you’ll connect with the audience you need. Our mission is to make MEBU Design & Marketing your preferred partner by delivering outstanding value, continuous innovation and an enjoyable client experience.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Nielsen Design Group

49684, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ndgworks.com

Nielsen Design Group, Inc., is respected regionally as a communication design consultancy. Since 1982 and prior, we have specialized exclusively, in corporate identity and communication systems design and implementation. Since our founding in 1982, our focus has been to help clients in the business, institutional and non-profit sectors to accomplish the key business objectives that define success, with branding that results in: Securing or creating an industry lead with strengthened branding that serves notice and garners new respect; Clearing up confusion in a market space, about what a institution’s brand stands for today, as distinct from yesterday; Improving the perceived value of a program, product or service in the light of new business objectives or market trends; Entering new markets confidently with branding that holds its own in a national or global space. We offer expertise 3 ways: 1) We create unique and memorable brand identities from scratch; 2) We evolve existing brand identities that leverage the best of current brand equity; 3) We apply either of the two brand identities above, to communication systems that ensure unified and consistent brand strategy across all media.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mebu-marketing.jpeg
MEBU Design & Marketing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Nielsen Design Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MEBU Design & Marketing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nielsen Design Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MEBU Design & Marketing in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nielsen Design Group in 2025.

Incident History — MEBU Design & Marketing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MEBU Design & Marketing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nielsen Design Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nielsen Design Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mebu-marketing.jpeg
MEBU Design & Marketing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Nielsen Design Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nielsen Design Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MEBU Design & Marketing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nielsen Design Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MEBU Design & Marketing company.

In the current year, Nielsen Design Group company and MEBU Design & Marketing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nielsen Design Group company nor MEBU Design & Marketing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nielsen Design Group company nor MEBU Design & Marketing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nielsen Design Group company nor MEBU Design & Marketing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing company nor Nielsen Design Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing nor Nielsen Design Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing company nor Nielsen Design Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Nielsen Design Group company employs more people globally than MEBU Design & Marketing company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing nor Nielsen Design Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing nor Nielsen Design Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing nor Nielsen Design Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing nor Nielsen Design Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing nor Nielsen Design Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing nor Nielsen Design Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References