Comparison Overview

MEBU Design & Marketing

VS

Detour Design

MEBU Design & Marketing

1 Rabbit run, Wilmington, DE, 19809, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

At MEBU we believe that your brand identity is your business path to success. By building a strong trusted identity with images your customers understand, you’ll connect with the audience you need. Our mission is to make MEBU Design & Marketing your preferred partner by delivering outstanding value, continuous innovation and an enjoyable client experience.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Detour Design

34 Delhi St, Adelaide, 5000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Detour is a graphic design studio that provides an experienced visual communication journey and brand direction through impressive ideas and design solutions for your business and brand. We believe that great design is integral to business success. With over 20 years of experience Detour offers creative, skilled, practical & affordable, strategic design that helps achieve that success. We have developed a ”Map” or process to help guide us: We listen & ask, we diagnose & prescribe. Then we create, solve & realise. By using our “Map”, we are able to respond to any brief, large or small, with knowledge, strategic agility and relevance. Our “Map” also give each of our team members the ability to manage their projects, over seen by a Creative Director. No account managers here. You work directly with “your” designer. We look forward to working with you.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mebu-marketing.jpeg
MEBU Design & Marketing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/detour-design.jpeg
Detour Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MEBU Design & Marketing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Detour Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MEBU Design & Marketing in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Detour Design in 2025.

Incident History — MEBU Design & Marketing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MEBU Design & Marketing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Detour Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Detour Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mebu-marketing.jpeg
MEBU Design & Marketing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/detour-design.jpeg
Detour Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MEBU Design & Marketing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Detour Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Detour Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MEBU Design & Marketing company.

In the current year, Detour Design company and MEBU Design & Marketing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Detour Design company nor MEBU Design & Marketing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Detour Design company nor MEBU Design & Marketing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Detour Design company nor MEBU Design & Marketing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing company nor Detour Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing nor Detour Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing company nor Detour Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Detour Design company employs more people globally than MEBU Design & Marketing company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing nor Detour Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing nor Detour Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing nor Detour Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing nor Detour Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing nor Detour Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MEBU Design & Marketing nor Detour Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X