Comparison Overview

MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital

VS

Newport Mental Health

MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital

575 S Dupont Hwy, None, New Castle, DE, US, 19720
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Comprehensive Care with Compassion and Respect MeadowWood Behavioral Health System is an 85-bed center where adolescents and adults can receive comprehensive treatment services for substance abuse, chemical dependency, and/or a range of mental health disorders. Located on a beautiful 11-acre campus in New Castle, Delaware, MeadowWood offers a serene and comfortable environment in which patients can escape the stresses and pressures of their day-to-day lives and focus on making the therapeutic progress that will support long-term recovery. Features of treatment at MeadowWood including the following: • Medically monitored detoxification: A safe and supportive short-term program in which individuals can rid their bodies of substances of abuse prior to fully engaging in therapy. • Adolescent Behavioral Health Program: Comprehensive care customized according to the unique needs of adolescents ages 12 to 17 who have been experiencing mental health or behavioral health challenges. • Inpatient Adult Program: Specialized treatment for adult men and women ages 18 and above who need intensive psychiatric services in order to achieve stabilization. • Senior Behavioral Health Program: Personalized services for older adults ages 55 and above who are experiencing age-related behavioral problems and complications related to dementia. • Co-Occurring Program: Treatment for adolescents, adults, and senior adults who are experiencing chemical dependency and a co-occurring mental health disorder. • Partial Hospitalization Day Program: Less intensive services for adolescents, adults, and seniors who can benefit from step-down support after completing an inpatient program or whose needs are not severe enough to mandate inpatient care. To learn more about MeadowWood Behavioral Health System call (877) 361-5738 or visit www.meadowwoodhospital.com.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 101
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Newport Mental Health

42 Valley Road, Middletown, Rhode Island, 02842, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Mission of Newport Mental Health is to improve the lives of children, adults, and families who live, work, and study in Newport County by providing the highest quality, recovery-oriented, evidence-based and integrated mental health and substance use care. Founded in 1964, Newport Mental Health provides services to children, adolescents, families, and adults who are experiencing mental illness, substance use, or stress in their lives, who would benefit from counseling and other behavioral health services and supports. Our person-centered recovery approach to care offers individuals a chance to achieve a better quality of life and recovery from emotional illness. No one will be denied access to services due to an inability to pay. There is a sliding fee schedule available based on family size and income.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 125
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meadowwood-behavioral-health-hospital.jpeg
MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newport-county-community-mental-health-center.jpeg
Newport Mental Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Newport Mental Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Newport Mental Health in 2026.

Incident History — MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Newport Mental Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Newport Mental Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meadowwood-behavioral-health-hospital.jpeg
MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newport-county-community-mental-health-center.jpeg
Newport Mental Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Newport Mental Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Newport Mental Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital company.

In the current year, Newport Mental Health company and MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Newport Mental Health company nor MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Newport Mental Health company nor MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Newport Mental Health company nor MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital company nor Newport Mental Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital nor Newport Mental Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital company nor Newport Mental Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Newport Mental Health company employs more people globally than MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital nor Newport Mental Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital nor Newport Mental Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital nor Newport Mental Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital nor Newport Mental Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital nor Newport Mental Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital nor Newport Mental Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N