Comparison Overview

MD Anderson Cancer Center

VS

Advocate Aurora Health

MD Anderson Cancer Center

1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, US, 77030
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center is one of the world's most respected centers devoted exclusively to cancer patient care, research, education and prevention. MD Anderson provides cancer care at several convenient locations throughout the Greater Houston Area and collaborates with community hospitals and health systems nationwide through MD Anderson Cancer Network®. U.S. News & World Report's "Best Hospitals"​ survey has ranked MD Anderson the nation's top hospital for cancer care. Every year since the survey began in 1990, MD Anderson has been named one of the top two cancer hospitals. The recognition reflects the passion of our 21,000 extraordinary employees and 1,000 volunteers for providing exceptional care to our patients and their families, and for realizing our mission to #EndCancer. You can view all of our career opportunities at careers.mdanderson.org.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 22,418
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Advocate Aurora Health

750 W Virginia St, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US, 53204
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Advocate Aurora Health and Atrium Health are now Advocate Health – the fifth-largest nonprofit integrated health system in the U.S. Advocate Health is the fifth-largest nonprofit integrated health system in the United States –created from the combination of Advocate Aurora Health and Atrium Health. Providing care under the names Advocate Health Care in Illinois, Atrium Health in the Carolinas, Georgia and Alabama, and Aurora Health Care in Wisconsin, Advocate Health is a national leader in clinical innovation, health outcomes, consumer experience and value-based care, with Wake Forest University School of Medicine serving as the academic core of the enterprise. Headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, Advocate Health serves nearly 6 million patients and is engaged in hundreds of clinical trials and research studies. It is nationally recognized for its expertise in cardiology, neurosciences, oncology, pediatrics and rehabilitation, as well as organ transplants, burn treatments and specialized musculoskeletal programs. Advocate Health employs nearly 150,000 team members across 67 hospitals and over 1,000 care locations, and offers one of the nation’s largest graduate medical education programs with over 2,000 residents and fellows across more than 200 programs. Committed to equitable care for all, Advocate Health provides nearly $5 billion in annual community benefits. Learn more: advocatehealth.org Read our social media community engagement guidelines: aah.org/social

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 14,988
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mdandersoncancercenter.jpeg
MD Anderson Cancer Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advocate-aurora-health.jpeg
Advocate Aurora Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MD Anderson Cancer Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Advocate Aurora Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MD Anderson Cancer Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advocate Aurora Health in 2025.

Incident History — MD Anderson Cancer Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MD Anderson Cancer Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Advocate Aurora Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advocate Aurora Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mdandersoncancercenter.jpeg
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advocate-aurora-health.jpeg
Advocate Aurora Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Improper use of Meta Pixel
Blog: Blog

FAQ

MD Anderson Cancer Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Advocate Aurora Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Advocate Aurora Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas MD Anderson Cancer Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, Advocate Aurora Health company and MD Anderson Cancer Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Advocate Aurora Health company nor MD Anderson Cancer Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Advocate Aurora Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while MD Anderson Cancer Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Advocate Aurora Health company nor MD Anderson Cancer Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MD Anderson Cancer Center company nor Advocate Aurora Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MD Anderson Cancer Center nor Advocate Aurora Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MD Anderson Cancer Center company nor Advocate Aurora Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MD Anderson Cancer Center company employs more people globally than Advocate Aurora Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither MD Anderson Cancer Center nor Advocate Aurora Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MD Anderson Cancer Center nor Advocate Aurora Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MD Anderson Cancer Center nor Advocate Aurora Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MD Anderson Cancer Center nor Advocate Aurora Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MD Anderson Cancer Center nor Advocate Aurora Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MD Anderson Cancer Center nor Advocate Aurora Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H