Comparison Overview

McVey & Murricane

VS

PC Communications

McVey & Murricane

13 Bath St, Glasgow, undefined, G2 1HY, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

With over 50 years’ experience and 21st century technology McVey and Murricane provide legal services in the internet age for the Scottish property market. We are consistently one of the largest conveyancing practices in Scotland which offer services shaped effectively to suit the times in which we live. Our specialist team of qualified experts have extensive experience to ensure clients are highly satisfied. Our Services include Conveyancing, Lending, Commercial property practice, and Business Legal services. Our dedicated team of conveyancers within the Residential Investment Department is one of the largest in Scotland and headed by Allan Radlow. To suit this digital age in which we live, we have developed numerous innovations to enable property and conveyancing services to be delivered empathetically and effectively despite the endemic issues with the current Scottish conveyancing process. As leaders in creating a modern internet based environment, 99.5% of our clients never visit our office and more than 70% of our work derives from outside of our Glasgow home area. This is due to our belief that electronic delivery systems are key to efficiency and convenience as we make it possible for clients to conduct transactions from the comfort of their own living room.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PC Communications

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We provide companies with the necessary resources to effectively utilize the ever-changing computer technology installed in their workplace. Continually educating individuals and enhancing their computer skills will increase productivity. We offer a wide variety of services designed to meet the needs of your firm or organization, including Training, Migration Consulting, Template Creation and Macro Programming, Helpdesk and Deskside Support, and Courseware Development.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcvey-&-murricane.jpeg
McVey & Murricane
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
PC Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McVey & Murricane
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PC Communications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McVey & Murricane in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PC Communications in 2025.

Incident History — McVey & Murricane (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McVey & Murricane cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PC Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PC Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcvey-&-murricane.jpeg
McVey & Murricane
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
PC Communications
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PC Communications company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to McVey & Murricane company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PC Communications company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McVey & Murricane company.

In the current year, PC Communications company and McVey & Murricane company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PC Communications company nor McVey & Murricane company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PC Communications company nor McVey & Murricane company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PC Communications company nor McVey & Murricane company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McVey & Murricane company nor PC Communications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McVey & Murricane nor PC Communications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McVey & Murricane company nor PC Communications company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McVey & Murricane company employs more people globally than PC Communications company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither McVey & Murricane nor PC Communications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McVey & Murricane nor PC Communications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McVey & Murricane nor PC Communications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McVey & Murricane nor PC Communications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McVey & Murricane nor PC Communications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McVey & Murricane nor PC Communications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X