Comparison Overview

McQuick Printing Inc

VS

Goodcopy Visual Communications

McQuick Printing Inc

616 North Perry Street, Montgomery, Alabama 36104, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

We are a mid-sized commercial printer serving the tri-county area and the river region. Our clients include several universities, law firms, non-profits and a host of other businesses. McQuick started as an in house shop for the Medical Association of the State of Alabama in 1994. From that time, the company was purchased by the CEO, William McGough Sr., and has grown exponentially since.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Goodcopy Visual Communications

110 Hamilton St., New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Goodcopy Visual Communications has been New Haven’s printer for the past 50 years. The full-service commercial printer offers graphic design, offset printing, digital printing, variable data printing (VDP), large format printing, bindery, direct mailing, customized web to print portals for online ordering and much more. Learn more about us and why #GoodMattersMost at https://goodcopy.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcquick-printing-inc.jpeg
McQuick Printing Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goodcopy-printing-&-digital-graphics.jpeg
Goodcopy Visual Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
McQuick Printing Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Goodcopy Visual Communications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McQuick Printing Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Goodcopy Visual Communications in 2025.

Incident History — McQuick Printing Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McQuick Printing Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Goodcopy Visual Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goodcopy Visual Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcquick-printing-inc.jpeg
McQuick Printing Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goodcopy-printing-&-digital-graphics.jpeg
Goodcopy Visual Communications
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

McQuick Printing Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Goodcopy Visual Communications company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Goodcopy Visual Communications company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to McQuick Printing Inc company.

In the current year, Goodcopy Visual Communications company and McQuick Printing Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Goodcopy Visual Communications company nor McQuick Printing Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Goodcopy Visual Communications company nor McQuick Printing Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Goodcopy Visual Communications company nor McQuick Printing Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither McQuick Printing Inc company nor Goodcopy Visual Communications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither McQuick Printing Inc nor Goodcopy Visual Communications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither McQuick Printing Inc company nor Goodcopy Visual Communications company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McQuick Printing Inc company employs more people globally than Goodcopy Visual Communications company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither McQuick Printing Inc nor Goodcopy Visual Communications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither McQuick Printing Inc nor Goodcopy Visual Communications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither McQuick Printing Inc nor Goodcopy Visual Communications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither McQuick Printing Inc nor Goodcopy Visual Communications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither McQuick Printing Inc nor Goodcopy Visual Communications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither McQuick Printing Inc nor Goodcopy Visual Communications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N