Comparison Overview

MCO Legals (Meharia & Company)

VS

J&G Law, LLP

MCO Legals (Meharia & Company)

New Delhi, 110014, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) is a solution oriented law firm with offices in different parts of the country and outside. This when combined with a unique industry knowledge and experience (50 + years) results in a solution best suited for the clients. Its unparalleled technology ‘MCOAPP’ and dedicated sector called "ClientCare" makes every information available to Clients, anywhere and anytime with just a click of button, ensuring flawless and transparent legal services.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

J&G Law, LLP

158 Orange Avenue, Walden, New York, 12586, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

A Full-Service Law Firm Focused on an exceptional customer experience. J&G Law, LLP represents businesses, individuals, nonprofits and families, throughout the Hudson Valley, New York with a broad range of legal requirements. Our attorneys combine sophisticated representation with a high level of client service. In every case, our lawyers strive to achieve our clients'​ goals efficiently and cost-effectively. We take pride in our roles not only as lawyers, but as trusted counselors and advisors. J&G Law, LLP was founded in 1968. Since our inception, we have expanded from a two lawyer firm to our present team of over 20 attorneys and a full professional staff of paralegals and legal assistants. For your convenience, we have offices in Walden and Monticello, New York. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This is not intended to be legal advice. You should contact an attorney for advice regarding your specific situation. Attorney Advertising.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mco-legals-llp.jpeg
MCO Legals (Meharia & Company)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jacobowitz-and-gubits-llp.jpeg
J&G Law, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MCO Legals (Meharia & Company)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
J&G Law, LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J&G Law, LLP in 2025.

Incident History — MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — J&G Law, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J&G Law, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mco-legals-llp.jpeg
MCO Legals (Meharia & Company)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jacobowitz-and-gubits-llp.jpeg
J&G Law, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

J&G Law, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, J&G Law, LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) company.

In the current year, J&G Law, LLP company and MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither J&G Law, LLP company nor MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither J&G Law, LLP company nor MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither J&G Law, LLP company nor MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) company nor J&G Law, LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) nor J&G Law, LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) company nor J&G Law, LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

J&G Law, LLP company employs more people globally than MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) nor J&G Law, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) nor J&G Law, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) nor J&G Law, LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) nor J&G Law, LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) nor J&G Law, LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MCO Legals (Meharia & Company) nor J&G Law, LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X